|
|
||||||||
AOA COMMUNICATION |
Address correspondence to Steven F. Schmit, EdD, Director, Division of Postdoctoral Training, American Osteopathic Association, 142 E Ontario St, Chicago, IL 60611-2864. E-mail: sschmit{at}osteopathic.org
The Osteopathic Postdoctoral Training Institution (OPTI) program was established by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) in 1995 as a support and accreditation structure for osteopathic graduate medical education. Since 1999, all AOA-approved postdoctoral training programs are required to take place in OPTIs. In a continuing effort to further define standards for quality and to promote program development, the AOA's 2007 Annual OPTI Workshop focused on recommended changes to the OPTI standards document. In addition, an OPTI Inspectors Workshop was held in January 2008 to increase interrater reliability in determining whether individual OPTIs have met specific criteria.
Currently, 17 OPTIs exist, each of which is periodically site-surveyed to determine the institution's quality and compliance with AOA accreditation standards.2,3 The results of site surveys are used to determine the length of the OPTI's continuing accreditation. For example, if an OPTI is determined to be "standard compliant" and is functioning close to the expected level of quality, it may be granted a 4-year continuing accreditation (ie, the next site survey would take place at the end of that 4-year period). Conversely, if an OPTI is deficient in various accreditation standard areas and is not operating at the expected level of quality, it may be granted only a 1-year continuing accreditation, requiring reinspection at the end of that 1-year period. Currently, if an OPTI demonstrates excellent outcomes, the maximum length of accreditation it can be granted is 5 years. As noted elsewhere,4,5 each OPTI site has been visited by AOA inspectors at least twice since site surveys began in 1997.
Currently, the most commonly cited areas of deficiency reported after OPTI inspections relate to research. For example, one of the most common deficiencies relates to standard 1.42, which states that each OPTI must identify and list the resources and opportunities for research available to interns and residents within that OPTI.3 Two of the other most common areas of deficiency apply to standard 1.43, which requires each OPTI to provide ready access to basic science and clinical research mentorships, and standard 1.44, which states that each OPTI must identify research and methodology support services available to interns and residents.3
| Recent Activities |
|---|
|
|
|---|
OPTI Standards, Refined
The AOA's 2007 OPTI Workshop was held at the Marco Island Marriott Beach
Resort, Golf Club & Spa in Marco Island, Fla, on May 8, 2007. The primary
goal of this workshop was to review the proposed OPTI standard changes, which
were posted for public comment on the AOA Web site. A critical review of each
standard and the rationale behind it were presented to the attendees.
The workshop provided a forum for meaningful discussion and critical review of recommended changes in preparation for the final adoption of the new standards by the AOA's Bureau of Osteopathic Education and the AOA's Board of Trustees in July 2007. Although many of the changes are simply clarifying phrases or statements from the various specialty colleges, several of the approved requirements are entirely new.3 For example, OPTI directors of medical education are now required to attend an Association of Osteopathic Directors and Medical Educators conference or an AOA osteopathic medical education conference to ensure their continuing development in topics related to medical education.3 All changes can be found in Accreditation Document for Osteopathic Postdoctoral Training Institutions and the Basic Document for Postdoctoral Training Programs.3
OPTI Inspectors Workshop
On January 9, 2008, an OPTI Inspectors Workshop was held at the Westin
Kierland Resort and Spa in Scottsdale, Ariz. The workshop trained OPTI
inspectors to determine whether an individual standard is met or not. It is
hoped that such training will increase interrater reliability. A decision as
basic as determining if a standard has been met, which is based on a clear
understanding of the intent of the standard and the necessary documentation,
is critical to ensuring the success of the overall inspection process.
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Submitted January 2, 2008; revision received February 5, 2008; accepted February 19, 2008.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Locations of osteopathic postdoctoral training institutions (OPTIs). American Osteopathic Association Web site. July 2007. Available at: https://www.do-online.org/pdf/sir_postdocoptilist.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2008.
3. American Osteopathic Association. Accreditation Document for Osteopathic Postdoctoral Training Institutions and the Basic Document for Postdoctoral Training Programs. Chicago, Ill: American Osteopathic Association; 2007. Available at: https://www.do-online.org/pdf/sir_postdoctrainproced.pdf. Accessed March 10, 2008.
4. Obradovic JL. Osteopathic postdoctoral training institutions. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007;107:54-55. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/107/2/54. Accessed March 10, 2008.
5. Webb JB. Osteopathic postdoctoral training institutions. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006;106:70-75. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/106/2/70. Accessed March 10, 2008.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |