|
|
||||||||
Address correspondence to Thomas A. Cavalieri, DO, FACOI, Interim Dean, Professor and Director, New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–School of Osteopathic Medicine, One Medical Center Dr, Stratford, NJ 08084-1354. Dr Cavalieri has no conflicts of interest. E-mail: cavalita{at}umdnj.edu
The elderly are often untreated or undertreated for pain. Barriers to effective management include challenges to proper assessment of pain; underreporting by patients; atypical manifestations of pain in the elderly; a need for increased appreciation of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes of aging; and misconceptions about tolerance and addiction to opioids. Physicians can provide appropriate analgesia in geriatric patients by understanding different types of pain (nociceptive and neuropathic), and correctly using nonopioid, opioid, and adjuvant medications.
Opioids have become more widely accepted for treating older adults who have persistent pain, but such use requires physicians have an understanding of prevention and management of side effects, opioid titration and withdrawal, and careful monitoring. Placebo use is unwarranted and unethical. Nonpharmacologic approaches to pain management are essential and include osteopathic manipulative treatment, cognitive behavioral therapy, exercise, and spiritual interventions. The holistic and interdisciplinary approach of osteopathic medicine offers an approach that can optimize effective pain management in older adults.
The elderly are often either untreated or undertreated for pain. Consequences of undertreatment for pain can have a negative impact on the health and quality of life of the elderly, resulting in depression, anxiety, social isolation, cognitive impairment, immobility, and sleep disturbances.4 Reasons that physicians often cite for inadequate pain control include lack of training, inappropriate pain assessment, and reluctance to prescribe opioids.2
As with other age groups, the elderly have pain that can be classified pathophysiologically as either nociceptive or neuropathic in origin. Alternatively, pain may be mixed, that is, having origins that are both nociceptive and neuropathic. Nociceptive pain may be either visceral or somatic and is due to stimulation of pain receptors. In the elderly, this stimulation may be the result of inflammation or musculoskeletal or ischemic disorders. Patients with nociceptive pain are treated pharmacologically with both opioid and nonopioid agents as well as nonpharmacologic interventions.1,3 Neuropathic pain results from a pathophysiologic disturbance of either the peripheral or the central nervous system. In the elderly, common examples include postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic neuropathy. Patients with neuropathic pain are less likely to respond to agents used to treat patients with nociceptive pain such as pain due to bone metastasis, and more likely to respond to adjuvant agents such as anti-convulsants and antidepressants. Pain of mixed origins may respond to administration of agents that treat for both nociceptive and neuropathic pain.1,4
Because diseases often have an atypical presentation in the elderly, it has been speculated that pain perception may be different in older adults. Although pain sensitivity and tolerance across all ages varies,5 it is generally accepted that such differences probably do not have a significant clinical impact.
As is the case in the use of any medications in the elderly, older adults are likely to have an increased risk of adverse reactions from pharmacologic agents administered for analgesia. This propensity is likely due to pharmacokinetic changes such as reduced renal excretion and hepatic metabolism, as well as pharmacodynamic changes that occur with age, such as an increased sensitivity to certain analgesics, particularly the opioids.2,4 In addition, polypharmacy is a contributing factor for the increased incidence of adverse drug reactions.
|
| Assessment of Pain in the Elderly |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Assessing pain in the elderly is often associated with significant obstacles. Older adults frequently fail to report pain because they may view that it is an expected part of old age or because they are fearful that it may lead to more diagnostic testing or added medication.1 Some patients may accept pain as punishment for past actions.3 Rather than admitting to the presence of pain, the elderly may use terms such as "aching" or "hurting."7 Communication and cognitive disturbances are additional barriers to such assessment. Increased agitation, changes in functional status, altered gait, and social isolation may be signs of pain in patients with dementia.6
A comprehensive assessment should include a careful history and physical examination and diagnostic studies aimed at identifying the precise etiology of pain. Characteristics such as intensity, frequency, and location should be described. Standardized geriatric assessment tools to assess function, gait, affect, and cognition should be used.8 Intensity should be assessed by using one of several pain scales that have been accepted for use in the elderly (Figure 1).
A verbally administered 0-through-10 scale is an effective measurement of pain intensity in most older adults. When using this scale, physicians can ask patients, "On a scale of zero to 10, with zero meaning no pain and 10 meaning the worst pain possible, how much pain do you have now?" Some older adults, particularly those with dementia, may have difficulty using this scale. Other tools such as a visual analog scale, numerical scale, pain thermometer scale, and pain faces scale can be helpful.1,4,9 Recently, evidence has established the reliability and validity for the use of the faces pain scale with older adults. 10
When possible, use of an interdisciplinary team approach to assessment and management of pain in the elderly is advantageous. These strategies need to be sensitive to cultural and ethnic issues, as well as to values and beliefs of patients and their families. Once etiologic factors are determined and therapy is initiated, a pain log or diary is appropriate to assess effectiveness of treatment. Physicians should encourage patients to record such documentation on a daily basis. Regular reassessment by use of previously administered assessment scales is important and serves to modify therapy to assure an optimal response. Reassessment should include an evaluation of compliance and the presence of adverse drug effects11 (Figure 2).
|
| Pharmacologic Management of Pain in the Elderly |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Inasmuch as there is still a paucity of clinical trials that focus specifically on geriatric patients, information regarding initial and titrating medication dosages may not be available. Therefore, initial doses should be lower and titration should be slower in the elderly. In addition, the general approach should be to start with nonopioid medications for treating patients with mild pain, advancing to opioids for those with moderate to severe pain. The selection of the agent should be determined by targeting the underlying pathophysiology if possible. For example, if pain is due primarily to inflammation, an anti-inflammatory agent should be given. However, if pain is predominantly neuropathic, an anticonvulsant should be used. At times, combinations of analgesics may be required.
Selecting an agent likely to cause the fewest side effects is paramount. Once dosing is initiated, it is essential that primary care physicians regularly and carefully monitor for drug side effects and adverse events.1,4 The use of placebos is unethical, and placebos should not be used in pain management,13 a position that the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) endorses in the statement prepared by the AOA's End-of-Life Care Committee,14 now the Council on Palliative Care Issues. (See pages ES35-ES38.)
| Nonopioid Analgesics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Because of their association with a lower incidence of gastrointestinal bleeding, selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors (coxibs) have been viewed as a safer alternative to the other NSAIDs; however, concern about their association with heart disease and stroke has dampened their acceptance and resulted in the withdrawal of rofecoxib (Vioxx) from the market.17 Prolonged use of NSAIDs in the elderly should be avoided whenever possible.
| Opioid Analgesics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Morphine sulfate and oxycodone hydrochloride, now available in both short-acting and sustained-release preparations, are commonly used. Short-acting opioids can be used in treatment of patients with intermittent pain, whereas sustained-release opioids should be given for continuous pain (with short-acting preparations available for breakthrough pain). The dosage of sustained-release opioids can be titrated based on the frequency of use of the short-acting preparation. For patients who may not be able to take oral preparations periodically, opioids are available as parenteral, sublingual, suppository (oxymorphone hydrochloride), and transdermal (eg, fentanyl patch) products.20
|
Antiemetics such as prochlorperazine or metoclopramide may be needed early on with the initiation of opioid therapy. Falls, dizziness, and gait disturbances are not uncommon; therefore, preventive precautions are often recommended, such as the use of an assistive device. Eventually, for most patients, the analgesic effect of opioids is preserved while tolerance develops to most side effects (eg, respiratory depression, sedation, nausea, and vomiting).1,4,11,21 However, because tolerance does not develop to gastric hypomotility, patients need to take stool softeners for as long as they are on opioid therapy. Chewing or crushing sustained-release opioids must be avoided as doing so can cause rapid absorption of the entire dose resulting in overdosing.1
Certain opioids should be avoided in elderly patients when possible. Propoxyphene is thought to be no more effective than aspirin or acetaminophen, but it is associated with ataxia, dizziness, and neuroexcitatory effects due to drug accumulation.22 Meperidine hydrochloride should not be used because of the accumulation of a nephrotoxic metabolite. Methadone hydrochloride should also be avoided in the elderly because it has a long and variable half-life, which makes titration difficult. In addition, the analgesic action is shorter than that of respiratory depression1 so patients whose methadone dosage is too low may increase their daily amount, which increases the risk of death from respiratory depression.
Transdermal fentanyl, contraindicated in opioid-naïve patients, should also be used with extreme caution in the elderly. It has a variable absorption rate in older adults and a long residual effect even when the patch is removed.
Tramadol hydrochloride, an analgesic that has some opioid properties and is used for mild to moderate pain, should be used with caution in the elderly because it may cause dizziness and reduce the seizure threshold.23
| Adjuvant Medications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adjuvant medications are particularly useful in managing neuropathic pain.4 Although tricyclic antidepressants such as amitriptyline hydrochloride and nortriptyline hydrochloride have been used to treat patients with this disorder, anticonvulsants such as gabapentin and carbamazepine are thought to be more effective.25 In addition, amitriptyline has significant anticholinergic effects that can be problematic for geriatric patients. Gabapentin seems to be more effective and better tolerated in older adults. However, the recently available anticonvulsant pregabalin is effective and easier to tolerate than gabapentin.26
Selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) drugs are effective and well tolerated when used for treating patients with depression, but their efficacy in pain management is not documented.1 More recently,however, serotonin norepinephrine-reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) in duloxetine, has been shown to be effective for the treatment of patients with neuropathic pain and seems to be well tolerated in the elderly.27
When selecting an adjuvant agent to treat the elderly for pain, physicians should: (1) prescribe medications with the lowest side effect profile for older adults; (2) titrate the drug slowly; and (3) assess patients carefully for both effectiveness and the presence of adverse effects1,2,4 (Figure 3).
| Nonpharmacologic Pain Management in the Elderly |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although many nonpharmacologic methods lack rigorous, evidence-based studies to document their efficacy, the body of knowledge to substantiate their use is increasing, particularly when such methods are used in conjunction with drug therapy.15,28,29
|
| Patient and Caregiver Education |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Complementary and Alternative Modes of Therapy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Spirituality |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary care physicians often are confronted by elderly patients such as the one in the following case scenario, which is representive of problems in pain assessment and treatment decisions.
| Case Presentation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most useful approach in this patient would be the pain faces scale, which, as previously noted, has been found to be reliable and valid for assessing pain in older adults.10 Given the patient's mental status, her responses to the other pain assessment options—open-ended questions, numeric scale, pain thermometer scale, and use of a pain diary—would not provide an accurate indication of the severity of her pain, which is most likely of nociceptive and neuropathic origin.
An attempt to reintroduce long-acting opioids after careful titration resulted in only minimal improvement in this patient's pain. Therefore, pregabalin was added because of the neuropathic origin of the pain. This addition was supported by the nature of the pain and the lack of pain relief through the reintroduction of long-acting opioids.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Gloth FM III. Pain management in older adults: prevention and treatment. J Am Geriatr Soc.2001;49:188 -199.[Medline]
3. Ferrell BA, Ferrell BR, Osterweil D. Pain in the nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc.1990;38:409 -414.[Medline]
4. Cavalieri TA. Pain management in the elderly. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002;102:481 -485.[Abstract]
5. Gibson SJ, Helme RD. Age-related differences in pain perception and report. Clin Geriatr Med.2001; 17: 433-456, v-v1.[Medline]
6. Herr KA, Garand L. Assessment and measurement of pain in older adults. Clin Geriatr Med.2001; 17: 457-478, vi.[Medline]
7. Miller J, Neelon V, Dalton J, Ng'andu N, Bailey D Jr, Layman E, et al. The assessment of discomfort in elderly confused patients: a preliminary study. J Neurosci Nurs.1996;28:175 -182.[Medline]
8. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist.1969;9:179 -186.[Medline]
9. Parmelee PA. Pain in cognitively impaired older persons. Clin Geriatr Med.1996;12:473 -478.[Medline]
10. Kim EJ, Buschmann M.F. Preliability and validity of the Faces Pain Scale with older adults. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2006;43 (447-456).[Medline]
11. Ferrell BA, ed. Pain management in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 2001;17:417 -615.[Medline]
12. Bellville JW, Forrest WH Jr, Miller E, Brown BW Jr. Influence of age on pain relief from analgesics. A study of postoperative patients. JAMA. 1971;217:1835 -1841.[Medline]
13. Bradley JD, Brandt KD, Katz BP, Kalasinski LA, Ryan SL. Comparison of antiinflammatory dose of ibuprofen, an analgesic dose of ibuprofen, and acetaminophen in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. N Engl J Med.1991;325:87 -91.[Abstract]
14. Nichols KJ, Galluzzi KE, Bates B, Husted BA, Leleszi JP, Simon K,
et al for the American Osteopathic Association End-of-Life Care Committee.
AOA's position against use of placebos for pain management in end-of-life
care. J Am Osteopath
Assoc.2005;:105(suppl
1): S2-S5.
15. Stucki G, Johannesson M, Liang MH. Use of misoprostol in the elderly: is the expense justified? Drugs Aging.1996;8:84 -88.[Medline]
16. Greenberger NJ. Update in gastroenterology. Ann Intern
Med. 1997;127:827
-834.
17. Topol EJ. Failing the public health-rofecoxib, Merck, and the FDA.
N Engl J Med.2004; 351:1707
-1709.
18. Forman WB. Opioid analgesic drugs in the elderly. Clin Geriatr Med. 1996;12:489 -500.[Medline]
19. Cavalieri TA. Pain management at the end of life. J Am Osteopath Assoc.1999; 99(6 suppl):S16 -S21.
20. Leipzig RM. Cumming RG, Tinetti ME. Drugs and falls in older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis: II. Cardiac and analgesic drugs. JAm Geriatr Soc.1999;47:40 -50.[Medline]
21. Miller RR, Feingold A, Paxinos J. Propoxyphene hydrochloride. A critical review. JAMA1970; 213:996 -1006.[Medline]
22. Schnitzer TJ. Tramadol: role in the management of pain in elderly patients. Home Health Care Consult.2000;7:27 -34.
23. Lipman AG. Analgesic drugs for neuropathic and sympathetically maintained pain. Clin Geriatr Med.1996;12:501 -515.[Medline]
24. Ross EL. The evolving role of antiepileptic drugs in treating neuropathic pain. Neurology.2000; 55(5 suppl):S41 -S46; discussion S54-S58.[Medline]
25. Jacox A, Carr DB, Payne R, Berde CB, Breitbart W, Cain JM, et al. Management of Cancer Pain. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 9. Rockville, Md: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; AHCPR Publication No. 94-0592. March 1994.
26. Pauson D, ed. Triple i Geriatrics Prescribing Guide. Carlstadt, NJ: Triple i Division, Medimedia USA; Spring/Summer 2007:176,198 .
27. Treatment Options: A Guide for People Living with Pain. American Pain Foundation Web site. Available at: http://www.painfoundation.org. Accessed March 20, 2007
28. Ferrell BR, Rhiner M, Ferrell BA. Development and implementation of a pain education program. Cancer.1993;72(11 suppl): 3426-3432.[Medline]
29. Mazzuca SA, Brandt KD, Katz BP, Chambers M, Byrd D, Hanna M. Effects of self-care education on health status of inner-city patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Arthritis Rheum.1997;40:1466 -1474.[Medline]
30. Keefe FJ, Beaupre PM, Weiner DK, Siegler IC. Pain in older adults: a cognitive-behavioral perspective. In: Ferrell BR, Ferrell BA, eds. Pain in the Elderly. Seattle, Wash: IASP Press;1996 : 11-19.
31. Jerome JA. Pain management. In: Ward RC, executive ed. Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003:171 -185.
32. Ehrenfeucter WC, Heilig D, Nicholas AS. Soft tissue techniques in pain management. In: Ward RC, executive ed. Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003: 212-226.
33. Nicholas AS, Bezilla TA, Jones R. Osteopathic manipulation for management of pain. J Am Osteopath Assoc.1999; 99(6 suppl):S5 -S10.[Medline]
34. Ferrell BA, Josephson KR, Pollan AM, Loy S, Ferrell BR. A randomized trial of walking versus physical methods for chronic pain management. Aging (Milano).1997; 9(1-2):99 -105.[Medline]
35. Sundbloom DM, Haikonen S, Niemi-Pynttari J, Tigerstedt I. Effect of spiritual healing on chronic idiopathic pain: a medical and psychological study. Clin J Pain.1994;10:296 -302.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |