|
|
||||||||
Dr Freeman serves on the speakers bureaus of GlaxoSmithKline Inc, Novartis International AG, Novo Nordisk Inc, and sanofi-aventis US, and he has received grants and research support from AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company.
Address correspondence to Jeffrey S. Freeman, DO, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism at the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, 4190 City Ave, Suite 324, Philadelphia, PA 19131-1626 E-mail: jeffreyfreemando{at}aol.com
Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are unable to achieve adequate glycemic control. Of the approximately 19 million individuals with T2DM in the United States, only about a third achieve the hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c0 goal set forth by the American Diabetes Association (HbA1c <7% [6% if it can be achieved safely]). The incretin mimetics are a new class of medications available for treating patients with T2DM. They mimic the action of incretins, which are peptide hormones that originate in the gastrointestinal tract. The two major incretins in humans are glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP). These hormones are released during nutrient absorption, augmenting insulin secretion. However, incretins are susceptible to degradation by dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DPP-IV). Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors suppress the degradation of incretins, thus extending the activity of GLP-1 and GIP. The glycemic profiles of patients after administration of incretin mimetics and DPP-IV inhibitors show improvement in postprandial glucose levels and ultimately in HbA1c. Therefore, incretin mimetics and DPP-IV inhibitors may play a clinically significant role in the treatment of patients with T2DM.
The pathophysiologic development of T2DM includes a progressive decline of ß cells, which synthesize insulin in the pancreas, as well as worsening insulin resistance. Therefore, efforts to alter the natural progression of T2DM by improving patients' insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity are of therapeutic benefit.1,6,7
The deterioration of glycemic control in patients is caused largely by the
progressive decline of ß-cell function. This decline results in deficient
insulin secretion by the ß cells, as well as excessive glucagon
production by the
cells of the
pancreas.7,8
Pharmacologic intervention to both increase insulin secretion and decrease
glucagon secretion may alter the natural progression of T2DM and improve the
glycemic profile of
patients.8
| The "Incretin Effect" |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A number of important considerations exist regarding the use of incretin mimetics in treating patients with T2DM. These considerations include the following:
The ß-cell secretion of insulin is greater after the oral administration of glucose than after the intravenous administration of glucose, expressed as C-peptide levels, in subjects without T2DM.9 This difference in insulin secretion is referred to as the "incretin effect."9,14
|
| Two Major Incretins |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endogenous GIP is a 42-chain amino acid peptide secreted by the lymphocyte K cells, which are located within the intestinal epithelium of the proximal duodenum and regulated predominantly with fat consumption.10,15,16 Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide is reduced during the fasting state and increased after food ingestion. The primary action of GIP is to stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion. Thus, enhancement of GIP signaling may have beneficial effects in patients with T2DM, but these benefits remain to be determined in clinical practice.10,15,16
Both GIP and GLP-1 are ubiquitous hormones. Their receptor distribution is located within several organs, including the brain, duodenum, kidneys, liver, lungs, pancreas, and stomach.17 The receptors for these hormones are mediated through a Gprotein-coupled adenylate cyclase, resulting in an increase of cyclic adenosine monophosphate and activation of protein kinase A.17 These actions lead to increased insulin secretion. Other signaling mechanisms involving GIP and GLP-1 receptors have been described in ß cells.12,13,17 Figure 1 illustrates the progression of events involving GIP and GLP-1 leading to insulin secretion within ß cells. Also noted in Figure 1 is the tissue receptor distribution of both GIP and GLP-1.17
Endogenous GLP-1 is a gastrointestinal hormone secreted from the L cells of the distal aspect of the small intestine. It is derived from a large proglucagon (ie, glucagon precursor) that also encodes for glucagon.10,16 Like GIP, GLP-1 is reduced in the fasting state and increases rapidly after a meal. It has potent effects on the ß-cell secretion of insulin and on gastrointestinal motility.18 The increase in insulin secretion after a meal is only partially influenced by GLP-1 local activity. Most likely, influences that are hormonally and neurally mediated also exist.18,19
The release of GLP-1 is attenuated in patients with T2DM after ingestion of a mixed meal. This attenuation has been demonstrated in patients with T2DM (N=54), with a significant reduction of the GLP-1 area under the curve during a period of 240 minutes after a meal, compared with individuals with normal glucose levels (P<.05).19 In addition, patients with impaired glucose tolerance in the study had a reduced GLP-1 response to a mixed meal. After a mixed meal, a reduction of GIP was also observed in patients with T2DM, but this reduction did not reach statistical significance.19
The effect of GLP-1 action protects ß-cell function.20 The outcome of events of GLP-1 stimulation results in increased insulin secretion, as well as decreased glucagon secretion, gastric emptying, and food consumption.20 These changes lead to improved glycemic control and a reduction of free fatty acids, which, in turn, may result in attenuation of both glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity in patients.20 In addition, GLP-1 stimulation produces direct effects on ß cells, resulting in proliferation of ß cells, increased cell regeneration, and reduced cell apoptosis. These effects have been demonstrated only in animal studies. They remain to be demonstrated in human subjects.20
|
In a crossover study, GLP-1 reduced hunger and increased early satiety in patients with T2DM (N=12) who received a GLP-1 infusion while consuming a mixed meal.21 Hunger scores and satiety scores associated with GLP-1 infusion were compared with those associated with saline infusion. After the start of the meal, hunger and satiety were improved significantly (hunger P=.026; satiety P=.028) and, as a result, food consumption was less in patients who received GLP-1.21
| Peptidases |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Exenetide is an exogenous incretin mimetic that is not susceptible to degradation by DPP-IV. Therefore, the action of exenetide lasts longer than that of the endogenous incretins GLP-1 and GIP. However, inhibiting the DPP-IV enzyme will prolong the actions of GLP-1 and GIP. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors suppress the degradation of incretins, thus extending the activity of GLP-1 and GIP.22 Several DPP-IV inhibitors are either available or in development for patient treatment, including sitagliptin phosphate and vildagliptin.22-24
Figure 2
illustrates the progression of events culminating in inactivation of GLP-1 and
GIP by the action of DPP-IV. The L cells of the small intestine synthesize
proglucagon, which is a precursor to GLP-1. This synthesis process is similar
to that of glucagon, though it takes place in the L cells of the intestine
rather than in the
cells of the pancreas. As a result, GLP-1 is
synthesized and increased in response to food consumption. Dipeptidyl
peptidase IV rapidly inactivates the GLP-1 protein within minutes of its
release.12,13,17
Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide is synthesized through a precursor
within K cells, which are proximal to L cells. Glucose-dependent
insulinotropic peptide is also inactivated rapidly by DPP-IV after
secretion.12,13,17
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: General Information and National Estimates on Diabetes in the United States, 2005. Atlanta, Ga: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005. Available at: http://ndep.nih.gov/diabetes/pubs/2005_National_Diabetes_Fact_Sheet.pdf. Accessed January 9, 2007.
3. Hogan P, Dall T, Nikolov P; for the American Diabetes Association. Economic costs of diabetes in the US in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917-932. Available at: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/reprint/26/3/917. Accessed January 8, 2007.
4. Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for
vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes.
JAMA. 2004;291:335
-342.
5. Koro CE, Bowlin SJ, Bourgeois N, Fedder DO. Glycemic control from 1988 to 2000 among US adults diagnosed with type 2 diabetes: a preliminary report. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:17-20. Available at: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/reprint/27/1/17. Accessed January 8, 2007.
6. Weyer C, Bogardus C, Mott DM, Pratley RE. The natural history of insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. 1999;104:787-794. Available at: http://www.jci.org/cgi/reprint/104/6/787. Accessed January 9, 2007.
7. Muller WA, Faloona GR, Aguilar-Parada E, Unger RH. Abnormal alpha-cell function in diabetes. Response to carbohydrate and protein ingestion. N Engl J Med.1970; 283:109 -115.[Medline]
8. Rickheim P, Flader J, Carstensen K. Type 2 Diabetes BASICS: A Complete Curriculum for Diabetes Education. 2nd ed. Minneapolis, Minn: International Diabetes Center;2004 .
9. Nauck MA, Homberger E, Siegel EG, Allen RC, Eaton RP, Ebert R, et al. Incretin effects of increasing glucose loads in man calculated from venous insulin and C-peptide responses. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1986;63:492 -498.[Abstract]
10. Drucker DJ. Enhancing incretin action for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:2929-2940. Available at: http://care.diabetesjournals.org/cgi/reprint/26/10/2929. Accessed January 8, 2007.
11. Drucker DJ. Incretin-based therapies: a clinical need filled by
unique metabolic effects. Diabetes Educ.2006; 32(suppl 2);65S
-71S.
12. Visboll T, Holst JJ. Incretins, insulin secretion and type 2 diabetes mellitus [review]. Diabetologia. 2004;47:357-366. Epub 2004 Nov 24. Available at: http://www.springerlink.com/content/0qk4t7u90jgakth9/fulltext.html. Accessed January 9, 2007.
13. Brandt I, Joossens J, Chen X, Maes MB, Scharpe S, De Meester I, et al. Inhibition of dipeptidyl-peptidase IV catalyzed peptide truncation by Vildagliptin ((2S)-{[3-hydroxyadamantan-1-yl)amino]acetyl}-pyrrolidine-2-carbonitrile). Biochem Pharmacol.2005; 70:134 -143.[Medline]
14. Nauck M, Stockmann F, Ebert R, Creutzfeldt W. Reduced incretin effect in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes. Diabetologia.1986; 29:46 -52.[Medline]
15. Meier JJ, Nauck MA, Clinical endocrinology and metabolism. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide/gastric inhibitory polypeptide. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab.2004; 18:587 -606.[Medline]
16. Gallwitz B. Glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus [review]. Treat Endocrinol. 2005;4:361 -370.[Medline]
17. Fehmann HC, Goke R, Goke B. Cell and molecular biology of the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-I and glucose-dependent insulin releasing polypeptide [review]. Endocr Rev. 1995;16:390-410. Available at: http://edrv.endojournals.org/cgi/reprint/16/3/390. Accessed January 9, 2007.
18. Orskov C, Wettergren A, Holst JJ. Secretion of the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-I and gastric inhibitory polypeptide correlates with insulin secretion in normal man throughout the day. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996;31:665 -670.[Medline]
19. Toft-Nielsen MB, Damholt MB, Madsbad S, Hilsted LM, Hughes TE, Michelsen BK, et al. Determinants of the impaired secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 in type 2 diabetic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:3717-3723. Available at: http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/reprint/86/8/3717. Accessed January 9, 2007.
20. Drucker DJ. Glucagon-like peptide-1 and islet ß-cell: augmentation of cell proliferation and inhibition of apoptosis [review]. Endocrinoogy. 2003;144:5145-5148. Available at: http://endo.endojournals.org/cgi/reprint/144/12/5145. Accessed January 9, 2007.
21. Gutzwiller JP, Drewe J, Goke B, Schmidt H, Rohrer B, Lareida J, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 promotes satiety and reduces food intake in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. Am J Physiol. 1999;276(5 Pt 2):R1541-R1544. Available at: http://ajpregu.physiology.org/cgi/reprint/276/5/R1541. Accessed January 9, 2007.
22. Mentlein R. Dipeptidyl-peptidase IV (CD26)-role in the inactivation of regulatory peptides [review]. Regul Pept.1999; 85:9 -24.[Medline]
23. Deacon CF, Johnsen AH, Holst JJ. Degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 by human plasma in vitro yields an N-terminally truncated peptide that is a major endogenous metabolite in vivo. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:952 -957.[Abstract]
24. Ahren B., Hughes TE. Inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 augments insulin secretion in response to exogenously administered glucagon-like peptide-1, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, and gastrin-releasing peptide in mice. Endocrinology. 2005:146:2055-2059. Available at: http://endo.endojournals.org/cgi/reprint/146/4/2055. Accessed January 9, 2007.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |