|
|
||||||||
SPECIAL COMMUNICATION |
From The Perrin Clinic and the Fund for Osteopathic Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, both in Manchester, England, and the University of Central Lancashire in Preston, United Kingdom.
Address correspondence to Raymond N. Perrin, DO, PhD, The Perrin Clinic, 11 St John St, Manchester, Greater Manchester, M3 4DW, UK.E-mail: rayperrin{at}btconnect.com
The cranial rhythmic impulse is a palpable, rhythmic fluctuation believed to be synchronous with the primary respiratory mechanism. The precise physiologic mechanism of the cranial rhythmic impulse is not fully understood. Based on traditional and current views of the cranial rhythmic impulse, animal studies, and clinical findings in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, the author argues that the cranial rhythmic impulse is the rhythm produced by a combination of cerebrospinal fluid drainage from the neuraxis (brain and spinal cord) and pulsations of central lymphatic drainage induced by the sympathetic nervous system. In addition, evidence is provided to demonstrate that a disturbed, palpable, and visible neurolymphatic process leads to chronic fatigue syndrome. This process may also explain the pathophysiologic mechanisms leading to other disease states. Finally, the author's proposed manual treatment protocol for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome is described.
An interesting area of exploration has arisen on the involvement of cerebrospinal fluid and lymphatic drainage in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).10 During the past 2 decades, I have observed hundreds of patients with this disorder who had CRIs and lymphatic drainage disturbances that were similar to each other and, apparently, intrinsically linked. These observationstogether with a review of previous studies involving the CRIled to the hypothesis investigated in the present study:
The cranial rhythmic impulse is the rhythm produced by a combination of cerebrospinal fluid drainage from the neuraxis (brain and spinal cord) and pulsations of central lymphatic drainage induced by the sympathetic nervous system.
In the present article, I also discuss evidence that CFS results from a disturbed, palpable, and visible neurolymphatic process. Furthermore, this process can be managed clinically with the combination of manual techniques I outline.11
| Cranial Rhythmic Impulse |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cerebral veins descend from the brain into the subarachnoid space by penetrating the arachnoidea mater and the meningeal layer of the dura mater, thereby draining into the cranial venous sinuses.14 However, as proposed by Vern and colleagues,15 other underlying processes may also be at work. Their experiments, which directly measured cortical cytochrome-c oxidase redox fluctuations in unanesthetized cats, "...strongly suggest that the cyclic increases in cortical oxidative metabolism represent the primary oscillatory process, followed by reflex hemodynamic changes."15
Contrary to the traditional concept that lymph has no pump of its own, the main lymphatic vessels are now known to be under sympathetic control.14,16 When the smooth muscle wall of the thoracic duct is stimulated, a wave of contraction is produced that aids lymphatic drainage into the subclavian vein.16-20 This drainage, in turn, produces negative pressure along the lymphatics, further assisting the process. The resulting peristaltic wave within the normal human thoracic duct was found to occur at 4 bpm with a maximum pressure of approximately 10 mm Hg, building up to 50 mm Hg when obstructed.17
| Investigations of the Fluid Drainage System |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When you tap the waters of the brain by compressing the fourth ventricle, see what happens in the lymphatic system. Visualize the lymph node that is holding some poison that has gathered there, changing the constituency before the lymph is moved along into the venous system.2
The founder of osteopathic medicine, Andrew Taylor Still, MD, DO,38 discussed the importance of examining disturbed fluid motion in the head to determine the pathogenesis of such symptoms as dizziness, headache, and memory lossall of which are associated with CFS. As he wrote, "We strike at the source of life and death when we go to the lymphatics."38 Dr Still emphasized that, along with sufficient blood supply, it is equally important to have perfect drainage.38
In 1869, Schwalbe21 demonstrated in rabbits that there was a connection between the subarachnoid spaces and cervical lymphatics. Sutherland1 postulated that gentle pumping action caused by one or more bones around the facial sinuses drains the mucus that is produced in the goblet cells of the sinus epithelial lining. This drainage facilitates the wafting action of ciliated epithelium, forcing the mucus into the nasopharynx.1 When mechanical or other forces damage this mechanism, the sinus is less able to drain mucus. As a result, the mucus pools and thickens, rendering the patient prone to infection.1 The nasal mucosa may then become continually inflamed with an abundance of purulent mucus and associated enlargement of the tonsilla pharyngea.1 Speransky22 first described the existence of a direct link between the cerebrospinal fluid, nasal lymphatics, and cervical lymphatic vessels. It has since been determined that lymphatic vessels in the submucosa of the nasal sinuses are the initial recipients of the drainage of cerebrospinal fluid through the cribriform plate.23
Quinke39 hypothesized in 1872 that there was drainage of cerebrospinal fluid from the subarachnoid spaces through small passages along the nerve roots. Other researchers24-26 have shown a small but significant drainage that takes place via the dural lymphatics, which run parallel to the spinal cord. Tracer material injected into the brain's cerebrospinal fluid in rabbits accumulates in the cuffs around the spinal nerve roots, which form a link between the subarachnoid spaces and the lymphatics.26 It has also been shown in rabbits that there is a flow of fluid from the brain to the deep lymph nodes of the neck, as well as a flow of fluid from the nasal mucosa to the brain.26
The spinal component of cerebrospinal fluid accounts for approximately 25% of total cerebrospinal fluid transport in sheep.24 The cerebrospinal fluid of sheep is drained out of the spine via the microscopic spinal granulationes arachnoideales, which are similar to the granulations found in the choroid plexus of the human brain's superior sagittal sinus.24
The system of cerebrospinal fluid drainage in humans is believed to be similar to that in other mammals, though the cerebrospinal fluid's lymphatic component is proportionally much smaller in humans.20,23,35 As in other mammals, the drainage of cerebrospinal fluid in humans includes pathways from the cranial and spinal subarachnoid spaces across the arachnoid villi. The pathways then continue to the dural sinuses and along the cranial nervesmostly via olfactory pathways through the cribriform perforationsand along the spinal nerves to the lymphatics (Figure 1).20,23,35
|
This bidirectional movement of cerebrospinal fluid is poorly understood. However, the movement is ultimately dependent on the relative pressures in the subarachnoid spaces at different parts of the neuraxis and in the central nervous system's parenchyma.28 In the rabbit, approximately 30% of the total normal cerebrospinal fluid drainage occurs via these routes, while this proportion is 10% to 15% in the cat.29 It has also been shown that almost half of the total volume of cerebrospinal fluid in sheep drains into the extracranial lymphatics, especially in the cervical region.30 In addition, the cerebrospinal fluid drainage into the cervical lymphatic system increases with greater intracranial pressure.30
By tilting the angle of an experimental animal's head by 20 degrees horizontally to the right or left, the drainage from the brain to the cervical lymph can be markedly increased.31 This demonstration indicates that gravity affects the flow of lymph. Such drainage may further act as a valve to relieve intracranial pressure, which would explain why pressure did not build up until the "breaking point" was reached in a study of hydrocephalic rats.32
| Pathogenesis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Lymphatics and Fluid Mechanics |
|---|
|
|
|---|
At this point I will draw your attention to what I consider is the cause of a whole list of hitherto unexplained diseases, which are only effects of the blood and other fluids being prohibited from doing normal service by constrictions at the various openings of the diaphragm. Thus prohibition of the free action of the thoracic duct would produce congestion of the receptaculum chyli, because it would not be able to discharge its contents as fast as received.
The thoracic duct pump acts as suction for the lymphatics throughout the body16-20 and influences the drainage of toxins from the central nervous system.23-27 Together with the average adult pulse rate (50-100 bpm)41 and the overall influence of ventilation (10-18 breaths/min),41 a separate underlying rhythm is induced: the source of the CRI.
Cerebrospinal fluid moves intracranially at the same rate as the beating of the heart.42 In addition, it normally flows within the ventricular system of the brain at approximately 600 cm per minute.43 The approximate blood flow in the carotid bodies in the neck (ie, in 100 g of tissue), just after leaving the heart, is 2000 mL/min (selective perfusion), whereas normal blood flow in the brain is about 65 mL/min (selective cerebral perfusion).41 The flow of lymph in the thoracic duct is known to be between 1 mL and 2 mL per minute between meals, though it may increase by up to ten times that rate during ingestion and absorption of a meal.44 These influences of fluid mechanics in drainage are summarized in Figure 5.
|
| Clinical Findings |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Congestion results in an impaired CRI. Alternatively, the cause could be the reversal of flow of the cerebrospinal fluid into the lymphatics. Both processes may lead to a buildup of toxic debris that could affect normal cerebral function. As Dr Still stated more than a century ago, "Harmony only dwells where obstructions do not exist."46
| Manual Treatment Protocol |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Conclusion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An improvement in the main symptoms of CFS coincided with an improvement in central lymphatic drainageand a stronger, more rhythmic CRI. This finding supports the view that the neurolymphatic flow described in the present article is identical to the CRI. If this view is proven correct in subsequent studies, the ramifications for the future of osteopathic medicine are immenseproviding a probable scientific basis for the use of manual treatment not only in patients with CFS, but for those with a variety of other disorders.
| Acknowledgment |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication August 3, 2006. Revision received January 18, 2007. Accepted for publication January 29, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Sutherland WG. [Chapter (sic).] In: Wales AL, ed. Teachings in the Science of Osteopathy. Ft Worth, Tex: Sutherland Cranial Teaching Foundation; 1990.
3. Woods JM, Woods RH. A physical finding relating to psychiatric disorders. J Am Osteopath Assoc.1961;60:988 -993.[Medline]
4. King HH, Lay EM. Osteopathy in the cranial field. In: Ward RC, ed. Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003:985 -1001.
5. Magoun HI. Osteopathy in the Cranial Field. 2nd ed. Kirksville, Mo: The Journal Printing Company;1966 .
6. Upledger JE, Vredevoogd JD. Craniosacral Therapy. Chicago, Ill: Eastland Press;1983 .
7. Norton JM, Sibley G, Broder-Oldach R. Characterization of the cranial rhythmic impulse in healthy human adults. Am Acad Osteopath J. 1992;2:9 -12.
8. Hanten WP, Dawson DD, Iwata M, Seiden M, Whitten FG, Zink T. Craniosacral rhythm: reliability and relationships with cardiac and respiratory rates. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.1998; 27:213 -218.[Medline]
9. Nelson KE, Sergueef N, Glonek T. Recording the rate of the cranial rhythmic impulse. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006;106:337-341. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/106/6/337. Accessed April 16, 2007.
10. Perrin RN, Edwards J, Hartley P. An evaluation of the effectiveness of osteopathic treatment on symptoms associated with myalgic encephalomyelitis. A preliminary report. J Med Eng Technol. 1998;22:1 -13.[Medline]
11. Perrin R. The Perrin Technique: How to Beat Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ME. London, England: Hammersmith Press Ltd. In press.
12. Farasyn A. New hypothesis for the origin of cranio-sacral motion. J Bodywork Movement Ther. 1999;3:229-237. Available at: http://www.elsevierinternational.com/journals/suppfile/flat/JBMT-cranial.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2007.
13. Nelson KE. The primary respiratory mechanism. Am Acad Osteopath J. 2002;12:25 -34.
14. Williams PL, ed. Gray's Anatomy. 38th ed. London, England: Churchill Livingstone; 1995.
15. Vern BA, Schuette WH, Leheta B, Juel VC, Radulovacki M. Low-frequency oscillations of cortical oxidative metabolism in waking and sleep. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab.1988;8:215 -226.[Medline]
16. Browse NL. Response of lymphatics to sympathetic nerve stimulation. J Physiol (London). 1968;197:25-36. Available at: http://jp.physoc.org/cgi/reprint/197/1/25. Accessed April 16, 2007.
17. Kinmonth JB. The Lymphatics. 2nd ed. London, England: Edward Arnold; 1982:80 .
18. Kinmonth JB. Some aspects of cardiovascular surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1960;5:287 -297.[Medline]
19. Kinmonth JB. Sharpey-Schafer EP. Manometry of human thoracic duct.J Physiol (London) .1959; 177:41 .
20. Koh L, Zakharov A, Johnston M. Integration of the subarachnoid space and lymphatics: is it time to embrace a new concept of cerebrospinal fluid absorption? Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2005;2:6. Available at: http://www.cerebrospinalfluidresearch.com/content/2/1/6. Accessed April 16, 2007.
21. Schwalbe G. Der arachnoidairaum ein lymphraum und sein zusammenhang mit dem perichorioidairaum. Zbl Med Wiss.1869; 7:465 -467.
22. Speransky AD. [Chapter (sic).] 1935. In: Dutt CP, ed and trans. A Basis for the Theory of Medicine. New York, NY: International Publishers; 1943:111 .
23. Johnston M, Zakharov A, Papaiconomou C, Salmasi G, Armstrong D. Evidence of connections between cerebrospinal fluid and nasal lymphatic vessels in humans, non-human primates and other mammalian species. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res. 2004;1:2. Available at: http://www.cerebrospinalfluidresearch.com/content/1/1/2. Accessed April 16, 2007.
24. Bozanovic-Sosic R, Mollanji R, Johnston MG. Spinal and cranial contributions to total cerebrospinal fluid transport. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001;281(3):R909-R916. Available at: http://ajpregu.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/281/3/R909. Accessed April 16, 2007.
25. Brierley JB, Field EJ. The connections of the spinal subarachnoid space with the lymphatic system. J Anat.1948; 82:153 -166.[Medline]
26. Czerniawska A. Experimental investigations on the penetration of 198Au from nasal mucous membrane into cerebrospinal fluid. Acta Otolaryngol. 1970;70:58 -61.[Medline]
27. Knopf PM, Cserr HF, Nolan SC, Wu TY, Harling-Berg CJ. Physiology and immunology of lymphatic drainage of interstitial and cerebrospinal fluid from the brain. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol.1995;21:175 -180.[Medline]
28. McComb JG, Davson H, Hyman S, Weiss MH. Cerebrospinal fluid drainage as influenced by ventricular pressure in the rabbit. J Neurosurg. 1982;56:790 -797.[Medline]
29. Boulton M, Flessner M, Armstrong D, Hay J, Johnston M. Determination of volumetric cerebrospinal fluid absorption into extracranial lymphatics in sheep. Am J Physiol.1998; 274(1 pt 2):R88 -R96.[Medline]
30. Silver I, Li B, Szalai J, Johnston M. Relationship between intracranial pressure and cervical lymphatic pressure and flow rates in sheep. Am J Physiol. 1999;277(6 pt 2):R1712-R1717. Available at: http://ajpregu.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/277/6/R1712. Accessed April 16, 2007.
31. Simmonds WJ. The absorption of blood from the cerebrospinal fluid in animals. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci.1952; 30:261 -270.[Medline]
32. Jones HC, Lopman BA. The relation between CSF pressure and ventricular dilatation in hydrocephalic HTx rats. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 1998;8(suppl 1): 55-58.[Medline]
33. Kida S, Pantazis A, Weller RO. CSF drains directly from the subarachnoid space into nasal lymphatics in the rat. Anatomy, histology and immunological significance. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1993;19:480 -488.[Medline]
34. Miura M, Kato S, von Ludinghausen M. Lymphatic drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid from monkey spinal meninges with special reference to the distribution of epidural lymphatics. Arch Histol Cytol. 1998;61:277 -286.[Medline]
35. Bradbury MW, Cole DF. The role of the lymphatic system in drainage of cerebrospinal fluid and aqueous humour. J Physiol (London). 1980;299:353-365. Available at: http://jp.physoc.org/cgi/reprint/299/1/353. Accessed April 16, 2007.
36. Mokri B, Aksamit AJ, Atkinson JL. Paradoxical postural headaches in cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Cephalalgia.2004; 24:883 -887.[Medline]
37. Cserr HF, Knopf PM. Cervical lymphatics, the blood-brain barrier and immunoreactivity of the brain: a new view. Immunol Today. 1992;13:507 -512.[Medline]
38. Still AT. The Philosophy and Mechanical Principles of Osteopathy. Kansas City, Mo: Hudson-Kimberly Pub Co; 1902. Available at: http://www.interlinea.org/atstill/eBookPMPO_V2.0.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2007.
39. Quinke H. Zur physiologie der cerebrospinale flussigkeit. Arch Anat Physiol. 1872:153 .
40. Perrin RN. Chronic fatigue syndrome: a review from the biomechanical perspective. Br Osteopath J.1993; 11:15 -23.
41. Bell GH, Emslie-Smith D, Paterson CR. Textbook of Physiology. 10th ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone;1980 : 210.
42. DuBoulay G, O'Connell J, Currie J, Bostick T, Verity P. Further investigations on pulsatile movements in the cerebrospinal fluid pathways. Acta Radiol Diagn.1972; 13:496 -523[Medline]
43. Kim J, Thacker NA, Bromiley PA, Jackson A. Empirical validation of cerebrospinal fluid pulsatility model [TINA Web site]. January 12, 2004. Available at: http://www.tina-vision.net/tina-knoppix/tina-memo/2004-011.pdf. Accessed April 23, 2007.
44. Nasimi SG, Harness JB, Marjanovic DZ, Knight T, Mearns AJ. Periodic posture stimulation of the baroreceptors and the local vasomotor reflexes. J Biomed Eng.1992; 14:307 -312.[Medline]
45. Nelson KE, Sergueef N, Glonek T. The effect of an alternative medical procedure upon low-frequency oscillations in cutaneous blood flow velocity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther.2006; 29:626 -636.[Medline]
46. Still AT. Philosophy of Osteopathy. Kirksville, Mo: AT Still; 1899:197. Available at: http://www.interlinea.org/atstill/eBookPhilosophyofOsteopathy_V2.0.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2007.
47. Group on Scientific Research into Myalgic Encephalomyelitis. Inquiry Into the Status of CFS/ME and Research Into Causes and Treatment. London, England: United Kingdom Parliament; 2006:25-26. Available at: http://www.erythos.com/gibsonenquiry/Docs/ME_Inquiry_Report.pdf. Accessed April 16, 2007.
48. Chikly B. Is human CSF reabsorbed by lymph? Lymph drainage therapy and manual drainage of the central nervous system. Am Acad Osteopath J. 1998;8:28 -34.
49. Miller CE. Osteopathic treatment of acute infections by means of the lymphatics. J Am Osteopath Assoc.1920; 19:494 -499.
50. Vodder E. Le Drainage Lymphatique, Une Nouvelle Méthode Thérapeutique. Paris, France: Santé Pour Tous; 1936.
51. Chikly B. Silent Waves: Theory and Practice of Lymph Drainage Therapy: An Osteopathic Lymphatic Technique. 2nd ed. Scottsdale, Ariz: IHH Pub; 2004:58 .
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |