| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
EDITORIAL |
Address correspondence to Stephen C. Shannon, DO, MPH, President, American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine, 5550 Friendship Blvd, Suite 310, Chevy Chase, MD 20815-7231. E-mail: sshannon{at}aacom.org
Osteopathic medical education (OME) is making great strides on many fronts. The colleges of osteopathic medicine (COMs) are growing in number and size, producing more osteopathic medical graduates than ever before. Osteopathic medical education is transforming the profession from one with a limited regional presence to one with not only a wider presence, but also greater national acceptance, recognition, and respect.
For several years, COM administrators have been witnessing growth in the number of qualified individuals applying to COMs,1-6 receiving a record number of applications for the 2006-2007 academic year.7 Today, nearly one in five students attending medical school in the United States is attending a COM.8 And, recognizing the serious physician workforce shortages that will confront the nation in the next decade,9 osteopathic medicine is stepping up to the plate to offer solutions that we are uniquely situated to provide. In addition to the growth in OME outlined in the February and March issues of JAOA—The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, the "osteopathic difference" in this context includes the osteopathic medical profession's tradition of a primary care mission—a mission that is desperately needed for today's and tomorrow's healthcare system.10 Also, osteopathic medicine's patient-centered approach is increasingly recognized as a model of care that all physicians should adopt.11
Similarly, there has been growth in the number of osteopathic graduate medical education (GME) programs.12 Within the constraints of the funding caps imposed on GME by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,13 osteopathic programs in primary care and specialty areas are providing more opportunities.12 In addition, competency-based curricular changes and enhanced evaluation processes for our schools and our GME programs are all helping to establish a culture of high-quality outcome expectations for OME.1,14
However, successful growth in a system that is undergoing transition may lead to new challenges, uncertainty, and anxiety about the future. As we move forward, we must ask ourselves the following questions:
Despite some uncertainty, there are numerous and noteworthy innovations occurring at osteopathic educational institutions. Take faculty development, for example, a key component of expanding OME. A number of schools have developed programs that extend the boundaries of traditional faculty development activities to educate osteopathic clinical teachers. Several innovations in faculty development are currently underway at COMs, including in the areas of web-based OMM18 and tools for rural preceptors.19 In addition, many of our colleges have developed formal educational programs for clinical faculty such as the Master of Science in Medical Education program offered at Lake Erie (Pa) College of Osteopathic Medicine,20 the Costin Institute for Osteopathic Medical Educators at Midwestern University/Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine in Downers Grove, Ill,21 and the CORE (Centers for Osteopathic Research and Education) Faculty Development Self-Assessment Instrument used by the Office of Faculty Development at Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine in Athens,22 to cite just a few examples. The American Osteopathic Association's (AOA) Council on Continuing Medical Education's recent approval of category 1A CME credit hours for faculty development is also a key step in responding to these needs.17
The statistics and data collected about OME are a necessary part of understanding the profession-wide changes underway and planning for the future. The annual medical education issue produced by the JAOA is a key resource for osteopathic medical educators and administrators. It provides basic information on students,1 COMs,1,23 osteopathic GME,12 CME,17 specialty board certification,15 and the Osteopathic Postdoctoral Training Institutions.14 The collection and analysis of this information, when coupled with other data sources, such as that gathered by the AOA and the Association of American Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine (AACOM), will help us answer the questions posed above and plan the future of OME.
As AACOM continues to monitor, analyze, and respond to growth trends in OME, we would be happy to share our activities with interested readers. I invite the JAOA's readers to subscribe to AACOM's free online newsletter, Inside OME, which includes information on this and other topics in OME. To subscribe, e-mail Wendy Bresler, AACOM's vice president for communications and marketing, at wbresler{at}aacom.org.
 |
References |
|---|
 Top References |
|---|
2. Griffin AVO, Sweet S. Undergraduate osteopathic medical education: addressing the impact of college growth on the applicant pool and student enrollment. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006;106:51-56. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/106/2/51. Accessed March 21, 2007.
3. Sweet S. Undergraduate osteopathic medical education [published correction appears in J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006;106:46]. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004;104:460-467. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/104/11/460. Accessed March 23, 2007.
4. Sweet S. Undergraduate osteopathic medical education [published correction appears in J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004;104:71]. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003;103:507-512. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/reprint/103/11/507. Accessed April 10, 2007.
5. Sweet S. Undergraduate osteopathic medical education [published correction appears in J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2003;103:215]. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002;102:576-581. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/reprint/102/11/576. Accessed April 10, 2007.
6. Singer A. Undergraduate osteopathic medical education. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2001;101:646-652. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/reprint/101/11/646. Accessed April 6, 2007.
7. Application services data [update]. Inside OME [serial online]. January 2007;1(1). Available from: Association of American Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine: Chevy Chase, Md. Available at: http://www.aacom.org/insideome/2007-01-Jan.asp. Accessed April 20, 2007.
8. Shannon SC. New Schools will help alleviate physician workforce shortages [from the president]. Inside OME [serial online]. February 2007;1(2). Available from: Association of American Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine: Chevy Chase, Md. Available at: http://www.aacom.org/insideome/2007-02-Feb.asp. Accessed April 20, 2007.
9. Council on Graduate Medical Education. Physician Workforce Policy Guidelines for the United States, 2000-2020. 16th report. January 2005. Rockville, Md: US Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.cogme.gov/report16.htm. Accessed January 31, 2006.
10. Allen TW, ed. Statistical tables on the osteopathic profession: distribution of DOs by specialty and age—excluding interns and residents. 1988-1989 Yearbook and Directory of Osteopathic Physicians. 80th ed. American Osteopathic Association: Chicago, Ill: 1988: 508-509.
11. American Medical Association. Recommendations for change in the system of medical education [draft report]. April 2007. Initiative to Transform Medical Education. American Medical Association: Chicago, Ill; 2007.
12. Obradovic JL, Winslow-Falbo P. Osteopathic graduate medical education. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007;107:57-66. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/107/2/57. Accessed April 11, 2007.
13. Obradovic JL, Beaudry SW, Winslow-Falbo P. Osteopathic graduate medical education. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006;106:59-68. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/106/2/59. Accessed April 20, 2007.
14. Obradovic JL. Osteopathic postdoctoral training institutions. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007;107:54-55. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/107/2/54. Accessed April 11, 2007.
15. Ramirez AF, Bell EC. Osteopathic specialty board certification. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007;107:117-125. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/107/3/117.
16. Bulger JB. Approval of ACGME Training as an AOA-approved internship: history and review of current data. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006;106:708-713. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/106/12/708. Accessed April 11, 2007.
17. Rodgers DJ. Osteopathic continuing medical education. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007;107:67-81. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/107/2/67. Accessed April 11, 2007.
18. Innovation Zone–IZone Instructor Resources page. Nova Southeastern University Web site. Available at: http://www.nova.edu/cwis/oit/izone/development/. Accessed April 11, 2007.
19. Faculty Development Resources page. West Virginia School of Osteopathic Medicine Web site. Available at: http://www.wvsom.edu/facstaff/facdev.cfm#_MaterialsWVSOM. Accessed April 11, 2007.
20. Master of Science in Medical Education page. Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine Web site. Available at: http://www.lecom.edu/lecom/masters/. Accessed April 11, 2007.
21. Costin Institute for Osteopathic Medical Educators page. Midwestern University Web site. Available at: http://costin.midwestern.edu/. Accessed April 11, 2007.
22. CORE Faculty Development - OUCOM Faculty Development. CORE Faculty Development Self-Assessment Instrument. Ohio University College of Osteopathic Medicine Web site. Available at: http://www.oucom.ohiou.edu/fd/FD%20Self-AssessmentFinalDraft.mht. Accessed April 11, 2007.
23. Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine in the United States [appendix]. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2007;107:83-85. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/107/2/83. Accessed April 11, 2007.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
