|
|
||||||||
MEDICAL EDUCATION |
Address correspondence to Joyce L. Obradovic, MA, RDH, Department of Education, American Osteopathic Association, 142 E Ontario St, Chicago, IL 60611-2864. E-mail: jobradovic{at}osteopathic.org
The Osteopathic Postdoctoral Training Institution (OPTI) program was established by the American Osteopathic Association (AOA) in 1995 as a support and accreditation structure for osteopathic graduate medical education. Since 1999, when the AOA began to require that all AOA-approved osteopathic internships and residencies take place within this structure, the individual programs have been evolving separately, with little interactionand with varying degrees of success. The AOA's 2007 Annual OPTI Workshop, scheduled to take place this April, is being organized with the primary goal of improving OPTI collaboration to better define standards for quality and promote program development. In response to common challenges and concerns, workshop participants will also be asked to define and reevaluate internal partnerships and shared goals as components of the larger system.
Each of the 17 OPTIs is required to undergo a site survey on a regular basis to determine the institution's quality and compliance with AOA accreditation standards. The results of this site survey are used to determine the length of the OPTI's continuing accreditation. For example, if an OPTI is considered to be "standard compliant" and is functioning close to the expected level of quality, it may be granted a 4-year continuing accreditation. The next site survey would take place at the end of that 4-year period. Conversely, if an OPTI is deficient in various accreditation standard areas and is not operating at the expected level of quality, it may be granted only a 1-year continuing accreditation, requiring reinspection at the end of that year. Currently, 5 years is the maximum length of accreditation that can be granted to an OPTI.
At publication, each of the OPTI sites has been visited by AOA inspectors at least twice since site surveys began in 1997.2 The average length of accreditation terms has increased with each new cycle of site surveys, moving from an average initial length of 2.3 years to 3 years, and indicating increased compliance with AOA standards.2
The chairman of the Council on Postdoctoral Training, Michael I. Opipari, DO,1 has noted that the system, though still in its formative years, is "the single most significant change that has occurred in the osteopathic medical profession in terms of postdoctoral education in our lifetime." Recently, the OPTIs have diligently set about finding the best ways to address the "growing pains" of this relatively new system.1
| Convergence of Concerns |
|---|
|
|
|---|
As outlined in the December 2004 issue of The DO magazine,1 representatives of all 17 OPTIs met for the first time in Chicago, Ill, on November 14, 2004, and November 15, 2004, at the AOA's first annual OPTI Forum. Topics addressed included:
Forum participants agreed that OPTIs should jointly develop a strategic plan that includes a mission and philosophy to help them answer questions of oversight and control, relationships with postdoctoral training sites, and a list of benefits of OPTI participation for partner institutions. In particular, the following four recommendations were developed with the goal of assisting members to better define partnership roles and expectations within the existing OPTI structure3:
The group generated a list of topics and questions for discussion that ranged from outcome success within the OPTI structure to OPTI commitment to defining the value-added benefits of the structure itself:
The AOA's 2006 Annual OPTI Workshop took place on April 4, 2006, in Savannah, Ga. Several OPTI members cohosted a breakfast meeting to conduct a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis to identify common challenges faced by OPTIs as organized under the current structure. Issues similar to those discussed in the AOA's November 2004 OPTI Forum arose in the workshop as a result of the SWOT analysis. These topics included:
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Submitted February 12, 2007; accepted February 12, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Webb JB. Osteopathic postdoctoral training institutions. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006;106:70-75. Available at: http://www.jaoa.org/cgi/content/full/106/2/70. Accessed February 15, 2007.
3. Burkhart D. Department of Education: Postdoctoral Education [informational report July 1, 2004 January 16, 2005]. Chicago, Ill: American Osteopathic Association; 2005. Available at: http://www.osteopathic.org/pdf/cal_midyr05stfrepeduc.pdf. Accessed February 14, 2007.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |