|
|
||||||||
SPECIAL COMMUNICATION |
From the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Department of Pediatrics in Camden (McAbee) and the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseySchool of Osteopathic Medicine in Stratford (Ciervo). Dr McAbee is also a member of the Division of Child Neurology at Children's Regional Hospital in Camden.
Address correspondence to Gary N. McAbee, DO, JD, Division of Child Neurology, Children's Regional Hospital at Cooper University Hospital, Robert Wood Johnson School of Medicine, 3 Cooper Plaza, Suite 309, Camden, NJ 08103-1438. E-mail: mcabee-gary{at}cooperhealth.edu
Injuries to the brachial plexus in neonates present a malpractice dilemma not only for physicians who provide obstetric care, but also for those who administer immediate postnatal treatment for newborns who have these injuries and comorbid medical conditions. Although trauma remains the probable etiology for many brachial plexus injuries, other, nontraumatic etiologies need to be considered. The authors review current medical and legal principles related to brachial plexus injuriesprinciples that are of concern to all practitioners who provide obstetric and newborn care. They also make a number of recommendations for practitioners to reduce the risk of malpractice lawsuits related to these injuries. Among these recommendations are increasing one's awareness of nontraumatic origins; making sure that appropriate testing (eg, electromyography) is performed for infants whose conditions fail to improve within several months after birth; and taking a proactive role in discussing brachial plexus injuries with patients' families.
| Classification of Brachial Plexus Lesions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Prognosis and Recovery |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recovery from congenital brachial plexus injuries may continue for as long as 1 year after birth. However, infants who are less severely affected usually recover within a matter of days or weeks. In 1982, Rossi et al4 reported a case in which the patient's recovery lasted until school age.
| Therapeutic Options |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For infants with poor recovery during their first few months of life, especially if there is extensive weakness in their conditions, surgery may be a viable option. Although the type and success of various surgical interventions remains controversial,8 some infants have demonstrated improvement in motor function after certain interventions.3,6,9 For example, one surgical option for infants more than 3 months old who do not appear to be recovering is reanastomosis (grafting) of the affected nerves to promote nerve regeneration.6,9 Other surgical options, if improvement in function is followed by a plateau, include nerve transfers and neurolysis (scar tissue removal).6,9 In older children, surgical options include joint capsule release, tendon transfer, and osteotomy to promote improved functional capacity.6,9 These types of surgical interventions are best managed by physicians who specialize in treating patients with brachial plexus injuries.
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging can also be important in management of brachial plexus injuries. It is of particular value in assessing patients for such complications as pseudomeningocele, traumatic arachnoid cyst, and syrinx.6
| Associated Conditions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although only a small percentage of brachial plexus injuries are associated with diaphragmatic paralysis, most cases of diaphragmatic paralysis have associated brachial plexus injuries.1 Mortality of neonates with diaphragmatic paralysis, resulting from respiratory compromise, is approximately 15% in infants with unilateral lesions of the brachial plexus, but mortality approaches 50% in infants with bilateral lesions.1
When a brachial plexus injury is presumed to be traumatic, the infant needs to be assessed for various other traumatic lesions. Such lesions include cervical spine injury with or without subluxation, facial paralysis, slippage of the capital head of the radius, shoulder subluxation, and unilateral fracture of the clavicle and humerus.1,10
| Etiologic Uncertainties |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many injuries to the brachial plexus in neonates are presumed to have a traumatic origin resulting from a difficult delivery. Signs and symptoms of such injuries include abnormal presentation, fetal depression, high incidences of macrosomia and shoulder dystocia, and prolonged or augmented labor.11 A connection between injuries and difficult deliveries is consistent with the presumed pathogenesis of some brachial plexus lesions, which involves stretching of the nerve roots from traction or, in more severe lesions, severing of the nerve sheath. Other brachial plexus injuries may be related to compression of the nerve.
The possibility that some injuries of the brachial plexus are caused by intrauterine malpositioning rather than traumatic delivery or compression has been proposed by some authors.12,13 This possibility is supported by the high percentage of abnormal presentations at birth (eg, breech, occiput posterior, occiput transverse) among neonates with brachial plexus injuries.13,14 The possibility is also supported by the occurrence of brachial plexus injuries in infants who were born prematurely or delivered by cesarean sectionin cases in which there was no shoulder dystocia and in cases in which there was shoulder dystocia but the posterior arm was the affected extremity.11,13,14 One study15 described Erb's palsy in several infants of normal weight who did not experience traumatic delivery. The presence of either abnormal dermatoglyphics, muscle atrophy, undersized extremities, or deformation of the ribs or neck are useful in indicating prenatal onset caused by intrauterine malpositioning.16,17 In addition, compression of the plexus against the walls of a malformed uterus or uterine fibroma, exostosis of the first rib, an amniotic band, and the umbilical cord have been implicated as etiologic factors.13
Electrophysiologic studies have demonstrated evidence of denervation (ie, nerve injury) within days after birthnotwithstanding the fact that it usually takes at least 10 to 14 days after injury for denervation to be detected with EMG.12,13 Thus, an EMG result that indicates denervation within the first several days of life suggests that an injury is likely to be prenatal in onsetthough recent data collected from animal subjects have raised questions about the use of EMG to time the onset of brachial plexus injuries in infants.7 Other studies have noted that EMG changes consistent with denervation may be found in the normal infant and, therefore, cannot be relied upon to determine etiology unless the findings are present only in the affected extremity.16
Nontraumatic, hereditary origins, though rare, should also be considered. An inherited autosomal-dominant brachial plexopathy (often referred to as hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy) has been identified.18 Although this disorder typically affects individuals in the second or third decade of life, it has been rarely reported in neonates.18,19 Both adult and infant patients may have mild dysmorphisms (eg, cleft palate, epicanthal folds, hypotelorism, short stature, syndactyly). The cranial nerves and the nerves of the lower extremities may also be affected. Episodes of weakness are recurring, and, during an episode, symptoms progress over a period of hours or days. Recovery usually occurs within 30 days, but some weakness and atrophy may persist.
A gene for hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy has been localized to chromosome 17q24-q25.18 The key to diagnosis is a family history that shows a similar clinical syndrome. There is a single report of a patient with an apparent bilateral brachial plexopathy associated with agenesis of the biceps muscle.15 It is likely that other nontraumatic hereditary origins of brachial plexus injuries will be reported in newborns.
| Malpractice Monetary Judgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The potential for monetary payout far in excess of the median is possible. In one case involving a child who had Erb's palsy with severe residual weakness, the verdict for the plaintiff was more than $3 million: $20,000 was awarded for past pain and suffering, $2 million for future pain and suffering, and $1 million for loss of future earnings.20
| Recommendations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Practitioners caring for infants with brachial plexus injuries need to take a proactive approach in discussing this medical condition with the infants' parents. Communication between caregivers and parents can be an effective risk-management tool in reducing malpractice lawsuits. Studies have demonstrated that parents who later sue for malpractice involving neonates often note a lack of communication between themselves and their child's physician.22 In one study, 89 (70%) of 127 mothers who subsequently sued for their newborn's perinatal injury complained that their caregivers did not adequately inform them about the potential for long-term neurodevelopment problems.22
Relevant to this discussion is a recent report23 suggesting a less promising outcome for patients with brachial plexopathy than had been previously reported. Pondaag et al23 reported that an estimated 20% to 30% of infants with brachial plexus palsy may have residual neurologic deficitspercentages that are much higher than the previously estimated 10%.1 In light of this revelation, it is imperative for physicians who care for infants and children to recognize the causes, associated medical conditions, appropriate treatments, and prognoses of brachial plexus injuries.
Based on our review of the medical and legal principles related to brachial plexus injuries, we conclude with the following recommendations:
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Physicians Insurers Association of America. Data Sharing Project 19852001. Rockville, Md: Physicians Insurers Association of America; 2002.
3. Grossman JA. Early operative intervention for birth injuries to the brachial plexus [review]. Semin Pediatr Neurol.2000; 7:36 43.[Medline]
4. Rossi LN, Vassella F, Mumenthaler M. Obstetrical lesions of the brachial plexus. Natural history in 34 personal cases. Eur Neurol. 1982;21:1 7.[Medline]
5. Brown T, Cupido C, Scarfone H, Pape K, Galea V, McComas A.
Developmental apraxia arising from neonatal brachial plexus palsy.
Neurology.2000; 55:24
30.
6. Piatt JH Jr. Birth injuries of the brachial plexus [review]. Pediatr Clin North Am.2004; 51:421 440.[Medline]
7. Gonik B, McCormick EM, Verweij BH, Rossman KM, Nigro MA. The timing of congenital brachial plexus injury: a study of electromyography findings in the newborn piglet. Am J Obstet Gynecol.1998; 178:688 695.[Medline]
8. Bodensteiner JB, Rich KM, Landau WM. Early infantile surgery for birth-related brachial plexus injuries: justification requires a prospective controlled study. J Child Neurol.1994; 9:109 110.[Medline]
9. Laurent JP, Lee RT. Birth-related upper brachial plexus injuries in infants: operative and nonoperative approaches. J Child Neurol. 1994;9:111 117; discussion 118.[Medline]
10. Eng GD. Brachial plexus palsy in newborn infants.
Pediatrics.1971; 48:18
28.
11. Gherman RB, Ouzounian JG, Goodwin TM. Brachial plexus palsy: an in utero injury [review]? Am J Obstet Gynecol.1999; 180:1303 1307.[Medline]
12. Jennett RJ, Tarby TJ. Brachial plexus palsy: an old problem revisited again. Am J Ob Gyn.1997; 176:1354 1356.
13. Alfonso I, Papazian O, Shuhaiber H, Yaylali I, Grossman JA. Intrauterine shoulder weakness and obstetric brachial plexus palsy. Pediatr Neurol.2004; 31:225 227.[Medline]
14. al-Qattan MM, el-Sayed AA, al-Kharfy TM, al-Jurayyan NA. Obstetrical brachial plexus injury in newborn babies delivered by cesarean section. J Hand Surg [Br].1996; 21:263 265.[Medline]
15. Graham EM, Forouzan I, Morgan MA. A retrospective analysis of Erb's palsy cases and their relation to birth weight and trauma at delivery. J Matern Fetal Med.1997; 6:1 5.[Medline]
16. Menkes JH, Sarnat HB. Perinatal asphyxia and trauma. In: Menkes JH, Sarnat HB, eds. Child Neurology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:451 454.
17. Dunn DW, Engle WA. Brachial plexus palsy: intrauterine onset. Pediatr Neurol.1985; 1:367 369.[Medline]
18. Jeannet PY, Watts GD, Bird TD, Chance PF. Craniofacial and
cutaneous findings expand the phenotype of hereditary neuralgic amyotrophy.
Neurology.2001; 57:1963
1968.
19. Menkes JH. Heredodegenerative disease. In: Menkes JH, Sarnat HB, eds. Child Neurology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2000:205 .
20. Reid v Nassau County, 600 NYS2d 604 (NY1993 ).
21. Eitel DR, Yankowitz J, Ely JW. Legal implications of birth videos. J Fam Pract.1998; 46:251 256.[Medline]
22. Hickson GB, Clayton EW, Githens PB, Sloan FA. Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. JAMA. 1992;267:1359 1363.[Abstract]
23. Pondaag W, Malessy MJ, van Dijk JG, Thomeer RT. Natural history of obstetric brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review [review]. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:138 144.[Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |