|
|
||||||||
Correspondence to Joseph Rasor, PT, OMS III, Administration, Phoenix Indian Medical Center, 4212 N 16th St, Phoenix, AZ 85016-5319.E-mail: joseph.rasor{at}azwebmail.midwestern.edu
In the United States, many visits to physician offices are for complaints of pain. Patients who have moderate to severe pain can be effectively treated with different modalities, including the use of opioids. Effective management requires that the physicians be open minded and thorough. Physicians should take a complete history and do a complete physical examination, including an osteopathic structural examination, to help develop a comprehensive treatment plan. This plan should include follow-up visits for continued assessment of the treatment plan. A continued reassessment of the treatment plan and the patient's response to the treatment has been shown to be most beneficial to the patient and the physician. Osteopathic physicians using the osteopathic medical model of treatment should identify psychosocial as well as somatic dysfunctions and appropriately treat patients for them. They should not avoid the use of opioids because of fear of patients' becoming addicted, but rather they should integrate the use of opioids in a multidisciplinary treatment plan. Opioids are potent drugs that require monitoring and dosing according to patient response.
| Use of Opioids for Pain Control |
|---|
|
|
|---|
With continued education of healthcare providers, modifications in healthcare policy, consistency in management, and assessment in patient care, the emphasis on opioids as a legal issue shifted to a focus on medical management approaches.6
| Clinical Evaluation With Pain Assessment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When patients are viewed as part of the treatment plan, they develop a greater understanding of their pain. They are able to better discriminate and characterize their pain, thus assisting physicians to better understand how the treatment plan is benefiting their patients. Patients should describe the pain in their words and use a diagram or illustration to designate the location. They should describe the onset, history, and pattern over time. Use of a visual analog scale (Figure 1) allows documentation of the patient's pain at each visit for future comparisons. Patients should describe associated factors that relieve or exacerbate the pain.6
|
|
Physicians must establish the treatment goal for each patient with pain and know what the patient expects. It is important for physicians to relate realistic goals to their patients, thus offering opportunity for patient education on treatment and for improved chance of success, as well as increased patient compliance and ownership of their problem.
A physical examination evaluating all systems, active and passive range of motion, strength testing, neurologic testing, and structural and postural assessment should be included in the initial assessment.8 Documenting objective findings allows comparison at follow-up visits to assess improvement or failure with the treatment plan. Applying the osteopathic model addresses the entire physical and spiritual being as a whole, allowing for the diagnosis of a somatic dysfunction.9 Figure 2 outlines the paradigm of treatment of patients with pain.
|
| Treatment With Opioids |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Administration of opioids for pain control has been shown to be an effective way to improve pain control and quality of life. Narcotics are potent analgesics that have potential for adverse effects. The risk-to-benefit profile of these drugs should be evaluated by both the physician and the patient.10
Many physicians are concerned about patients' becoming addicted with the use of opioids for pain management. It was found that physicians prescribing opioid therapy had a confidence level of 75% in patients with chronic cancer pain and no history of drug abuse and their confidence level dropped to 3% for patients with noncancer pain and drug abuse history. Only between 3.2% and 18.9% of patients with a prior history of addictive behavior become addicted, a prevalence rate that is approximate to that of the general population without a history of addiction.11 Furthermore, for patients with no history of drug abuse for whom opioid medication was prescribed for pain, the prevalence of drug addiction drops to less than 1%.12
It is well documented that clear differences exist between physical dependence, tolerance, and addiction (Figure 3). Tolerance occurs when the body adapts to the daily dose of the drug such that the pharmacologic effect is reduced; consequently, more drug is required to achieve the desired therapeutic action. Physical dependence is a more significant adaptation such that withdrawal reactions would occur on decreasing the dose. Addiction is a behavioral response whereby a person, despite adverse consequences, acts on compulsion to obtain and consume a drug. Undertreatment for pain may lead to drug-seeking behaviors to self-medicate.11,12
An understanding should be made between the patient and the physician that the patient's potent medication is for his or her use only and is to be taken as agreed on by the patient and the physician. Such an understanding should be written as contract or agreement signed by both parties (Figure 4). It is essential that there be one prescribing physician and one pharmacy to avoid the potential for error or diversion, or both.
|
Selection of the proper opioid (Figure 5) is crucial. Opioid dosing and conversion are complex procedures, as indicated by three Web sites.13-15 The greater the affinity of the opioid at the mu receptor, the greater the analgesic effect or potency.10 Opioids have pharmacokinetic differences in their bioavailability, such as morphine, which is the standard, compared with fentanyl, which is 50 times the potency of morphine. The medication becomes converted in the liver and to a lesser degree in the kidneys into the active metabolites.10 Scheduling dosing is more effective at pain control and improving quality of life.16 Combining sustained-release and immediate-release dosage forms has been shown to be effective.16 Having "rescue" or "breakthrough"' medication (ie, immediate-release), allows the patient in periods of aggravated pain to increase the dose in minor steps to stabilize the pain.17
|
Having a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals who coordinate their efforts has proven to be effective in the management of pain. Depending on the identified specific needs of the patient, the team approach could consist of physical therapy, occupational therapy, psychologic treatment, sclerotherapy, physiatrics, interventional anesthesia, or invasive procedures (singly or in combination).8 The multidisciplinary approach has been shown to increase the pain reduction by 20% to 40%, and the effects are maintained up to 2 years.7 Using osteopathic medicine skills during office visits can aid in pain reduction. Improving postural and mechanical alignments, fascial strains, and tissue texture changes through the use of OMT can be highly effective for pain management and the body's innate ability to heal, the very foundation of osteopathic medicine.19
When the patient has improved significantly, it is vital that the opioid medication not be discontinued abruptly so as to avoid the patient's having withdrawal symptoms. The patient must be tapered off of the medication by decreasing the dose slowly, reducing the dose every 2 to 3 days.11
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
This continuing medical education publication supported by an unrestricted educational grant from Purdue Pharma LP
From the Phoenix Indian Medical Center, Indian Health Service, United States Public Health Service, where Mr Rasor is on staff in the Department of Physical Therapy and Dr Harris is a full-time attending physician in the Department of Internal Medicine. Mr Rasor is a third-year osteopathic medical student at Midwestern University's Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine in Glendale; he participates in the Hoop of Learning programs that encourage Native American youth to pursue careers in healthcare. Dr Harris is an associate adjunct professor of clinical medicine at Midwestern University's Arizona College of Osteopathic Medicine in Glendale.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Pain in America: A Research Report. Gallup Organization for Merck & Co, Inc; New York, NY: Olgilvy Public Relations;2000 .
3. Stewart WF, Ricci JA, Chee E, Morganstein, Lipton R. Lost
productive time and costs due to common pain conditions in the US workforce.
JAMA. 2003;290:2443
2454.
4. Pain and Absenteeism in the Workplace. Louis and Harris Associates for Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc;1996 .
5. Fine PG, Portenoy RK. A Clinical Guide to Opioid Analgesia. Minneapolis, Minn: McGraw-Hill Companies;2004
6. Washington State Department of Labor and Industries. Guidelines for Outpatient Prescription of Oral Opioids for Injured Workers with Chronic, Noncancer Pain. Olympia, Wash: Washington State Department of Labor and Industries; 2002.
7. Gallagher RM. Rational integration of pharmacologic, behavioral, and rehabilitation strategies in the treatment of chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(3 suppl): S64S76.[Medline]
8. Sanders SH, Harden N, Benson SE, Vicente PJ. Clinical practice guidelines for chronic non-malignant pain syndrome patients II: an evidence-based approach. J Back Musculoskel Rehabil.1999; 13:47 58.
9. Broekhuizen J, Dekker A, Warne D. Evaluation and treatment of chronic pain in the Native American Patient. American College of Osteopathic Family Physicians CME Supplement. November/December 2004:1-7. Available at: http://www.acofp.org/member_publications/1104_supp.html. Accessed June 7, 2005.
10. Quang-Cantagrel ND, Wallace MS, Magnuson SK. Opioid substitution to
improve the effectiveness of chronic noncancer pain control: a chart review.
Anesth Analg.2000; 90:933
937.
11. Weaver M, Schnoll S. Abuse liability in opioid therapy for pain treatment in patients with an addiction history. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(4 suppl):S61 S69.[Medline]
12. Greenwald BD, Narcessian EJ, Pomeranz BA. Assessment of physiatrists' knowledge and perspectives on the use of opioids: review of basic concepts for managing chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78:408 415.[Medline]
13. McCarberg BH, Barkin RL. Long-acting opioids for chronic pain: pharmacotherapeutic opportunities to enhance compliance, quality of life and analgesia. Am J Therap.2001; 8(3):181 186.
14. http://www.hosppract.com/issues/2000/09/brook.htm;
15. http://www.hivpositive.com/f-PainHIV/Pain/table11.html.
16. http://www.hivpositive.com/f-PainHIV/Pain/LS3.3.html.
17. Bloodworth D. Issues in opioid management. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(3 suppl):S42 S55.[Medline]
18. Cohen MJ, Jasser S, Herron PD, Margolis CG. Ethical perspectives: opioid treatment of chronic pain in the context of addiction. Clin J Pain. 2002;18(suppl):S99 S107.[Medline]
19. Licciardone JC. The unique role of osteopathic physicians in
treating patients with low back pain. J Am Osteopath
Assoc. 2004;104(suppl 8):S13
S18.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. J. Nichols Pearls for End-of-Life Care J Am Osteopath Assoc, June 1, 2007; 107(suppl_4): ES1 - ES2. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Cavalieri Managing Pain in Geriatric Patients J Am Osteopath Assoc, June 1, 2007; 107(suppl_4): ES10 - ES16. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. E. D'Alonzo Jr and K. B. Stipp American Osteopathic Association Adopts Policies on Treatment of Patients in Pain: An Overview J Am Osteopath Assoc, November 1, 2005; 105(suppl_5): S29 - S31. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |