JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JAOA • Vol 105 • No 1 • January 2005 • 25-
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rohde, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahmoud, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rohde, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahmoud, E.

STUDENT CONTRIBUTION

Is Equity Being Sacrificed? The Effect of User Fees on the Willingness and ability to pay for Schistosomiasis Control in the Lake Victoria Region of Tanzania

Jesse M. Rohde*; Mathias Abuya{dagger}; Sharon Kunin-Brown*; Eiman Mahmoud, MD, MPH*

This study asks: In an effort to finance schistosomiasis prevention and treatment activities, have countries such as Tanzania lost sight of those most in need? With the new policy of user-fee charges in place, is effective treatment still a priority for those in heavily endemic regions? The impact of charges on health-seeking behavior is crucial to disease control in Tanzania. The decentralization of the country's healthcare system has led to an increase in the need for income generation at all operational levels. In general, people have accepted the costs of curative services. However, the impact of user-fee charges on health-seeking behavior has yet to be assessed. This is a crosssectional study of willingness and ability to pay for schistosomiasis control. Questionnaires were administered to household heads of six representative fishing and farming communities in the Lake Victoria Region of Tanzania, East Africa. A total of 103 questionnaires were analyzed. The yearly mean household expenditure on schistosomiasis diagnosis and treatment was 7,000Ts ± 60,000Ts (US$1 = 1,000Ts), accounting for 1.54% of the total yearly household income. Most household heads (85 [83%]) thought schistosomiasis was the greatest health threat in their communities, but only 27 (26%) of them were willing to pay for screening, diagnosis, and treatment of the infection. On the other hand, 72 (70%) were willing to do volunteer work in exchange for schistosomiasis control. Exposure and livelihood cannot be separated; the future of disease control in this endemic region of Tanzania is about access, not prevention.

* Touro Univeristy College of Osteopatthic Medicine (TUCOM), Vallejo, Calif; {dagger} Shirati Community Health Center, Shirati, Tanzania, East Africa





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rohde, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahmoud, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rohde, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Mahmoud, E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS