|
|
||||||||
REVIEW ARTICLE |
Address correspondence to John M. McPartland, DO, MS, Faculty of Health & Environmental Science, Unitec Institute of Technology, Private Bag 92025, Auckland, New Zealand.E-mail: jmcpartland{at}unitec.ac.nz
The proposed etiology of Travell trigger points (TrPs) has undergone a fundamental revision in recent years. New research results suggest that TrPs are evoked by the abnormal depolarization of motor end plates. This article expands the proposed etiology to include presynaptic, synaptic, and postsynaptic mechanisms of abnormal depolarization (ie, excessive release of acetycholine [ACh], defects of acetylcholinesterase, and upregulation of nicotinic ACh-receptor activity, respectively).
This working hypothesis regarding the etiology of TrPs has changed the approach to treating TrPs. As an example, Travell and Simons abandoned the application of ischemic compression to TrPs; instead the authors adopted several techniques associated with osteopathic medicine (ie, muscle-energy, myofascial, counterstrain; high-velocity, low-amplitude). Scientists are now proposing and reporting the results of new approaches using capsaicin, a vanilloid-receptor agonist, and ACh antagonists (eg, dimethisoquin hydrochloride, botulinum toxin, quinidine, linalool). The purpose of this article is to review these new concepts and describe new resulting approaches to the treatment of TrPs.
Travell defined a TrP as "a hyperirritable spot in skeletal muscle that is associated with a hypersensitive palpable nodule in a taut band. The spot is tender when pressed and can give rise to characteristic referred pain, motor dysfunction, and autonomic phenomena."5 An example of this is shown in Figure 1. The taut band of muscle is best characterized as a palpable, ropy structure.
|
Palpation is a reliable diagnostic criterion for locating TrPs in
patients.6 The
reliability of diagnosing TrPs is similar to the reliability of diagnosing
tender points in the counterstrain system developed by Lawrence H. Jones,
DO.7 An
interrater-reliability study of this counterstrain system demonstrated that
clinicians agreed 73% of the time (
= 0.45); the palpation of patients'
TrPs proved more reliable than the standard osteopathic TART
examination.7 (TART
is a mnemonic for the four criteria of somatic dysfunction: tissue texture
abnormality, asymmetry, restriction of motion, and
tenderness.7)
Myofascial trigger points can be inactivated by a variety of approaches, including osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT), massage therapy, ultrasound therapy, "spray and stretch," as well as needling (acupuncture or injection). A full account that describes the diagnosis and treatment of Travell TrPs is provided by Kuchera and McPartland in Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine.8 This article serves as a companion piece to Kuchera and McPartland's chapter in Foundations, describing a new working hypothesis regarding the etiology of TrPs and the way in which this new hypothesis changes our treatment of these points. Most of the material in this article was mistakenly deleted from the final version of the Foundations chapter.
Proposed Etiology of TrPs
The 1999 edition of Travell and Simons' Myofascial Pain and
Dysfunction: The Trigger Point
Manual5
proposes an "integrated hypothesis" regarding the etiology of
TrPs. Such an integrated hypothesis involves local myofascial tissues, the
central nervous system (CNS), and biomechanical factors.
A biopsy of local myofascial tissue in the vicinity of TrPs revealed that
the tissues contained "contraction knots," described as
"large, rounded, darkly staining muscle fibers and a statistically
significant increase in the average diameter of muscle
fibers."9
Electromyographic (EMG) studies of TrPs have indicated spontaneous electrical
activity (SEA) in TrPs, while adjacent muscle tissues are electrically
silent.10 These
intersecting discoveries led Travell and Simons to implicate dysfunctional
motor end plates as the underlying etiology of TrPs. The terms motor end
plates and neuromuscular junction are interchangeable, although
the first term describes structure and the latter reflects function. Both
terms refer to the point where
-motor neurons contact their target
muscle fibers. (See Figure
2 for a schematic drawing of a motor end plate.) The
correlation between motor end plates and TrPs ("myalgic spots")
was first elucidated in a study conducted by Gunn and Milbrandt in
1977.11
|
Travell and Simons attributed motor end plate dysfunction to an excessive release of acetylcholine (ACh) from the presynaptic motor nerve terminal.5,9 Acetylcholine released into the synaptic cleft rapidly activates nicotinic ACh receptors (nAChRs) on the postsynaptic muscle membrane, leading to a muscle action potential and muscle contraction (Figure 2). Travell and Simons' hypothesis of a presynaptic dysfunction, however, is only one way to interpret the results of EMG studies. As the EMG electrodes are placed in postsynaptic muscle fibers, the increased SEA measured in TrPs could be attributed to the result of presynaptic, synaptic, or postsynaptic dysfunction.5 All of these dysfunctions can be inherited (genetic) or acquired.
Genetic Defects
Gene mutations frequently arise as nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs,
pronounced "snips") and microsatellite polymorphisms. Single
nucleotide polymorphisms are common deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) variations
among individuals, caused by a single-point mutation. Microsatellite
polymorphisms are mutated DNA loci that contain nucleotide repeats. Pellegrino
et al12 implicated
genetic factors in the formation of TrPs.
Genetic defects of motor end plates can be presynaptic, synaptic, or
postsynaptic.13
Presynaptically, the release of ACh depends on the calcium ion
(Ca2+) concentration in the
-motor nerve terminal. Excessive
release of ACh may be caused by defects of L-type and N-type voltage-gated
Ca2+
channels.14 An
Internet search of the SNP catalog maintained by the National Center for
Biotechnology Information (available at:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov)
reveals 695 reports of L-type Ca2+ channel mutations and 57 reports
of N-type Ca2+ channel mutations. Thus, a genetic cause for excess
ACh release may be quite common.
Synaptically, ACh is normally inactivated by the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) (Figure 2). Genetic defects of AChE may cause excess ACh to remain in the synaptic cleft.13
Postsynaptically, a gain-of-function defect of nAChR may confer muscle hyperexcitability, a hallmark of Travell TrPs. The nAChR is an assembly of 5 subunits; at least 16 genes encode nAChR subunits that combine in a variety of ways.15 Thus, nAChR is particularly susceptible to mutation defects. The nAChR in the motor end plate expresses different subunits than nAChR expressed in the CNS or in the autonomic nerves. Gain-of-function mutations result in the overexpression of nAChRs in the muscle cell membrane, as well as resulting in nAChRs that are hypersenstive to ACh. These mutations also result in nAChRs that become constitutively active.16
Acquired Defects
Many ion channels and neuroreceptors are expressed by more than one gene.
These genetic subtypes are expressed in cells in different parts of the body
for different needs and at different points in the life cycle. Dysregulated
expression of these genes will produce acquired defects. To illustrate this
mechanism, consider the 16 genes that encode nAChR subunits. The gene that
encodes a CNS nAChR may become dysregulated in a muscle cell and may begin
producing CNS nAChRs in the motor end plate. Couple this dysfunction with
tobacco smoking. Nicotine normally activates CNS AChRs and not motor end plate
AchRs. If dysregulated, however, CNS nAChRs become expressed in motor end
plates. Nicotine would then activate those receptors in motor end plates,
potentially causing TrPs.
Single genes may also become dysregulated should they express splice variants. Splice variants are alternative ways in which a gene's protein-coding sections (exons) are joined together to create a messenger ribonucleic acid molecule and its translated protein. For example, AChE expresses several subtypes that are produced by alternative splicing of the single AChE gene.17 These subtypes are induced under psychological, chemical, and physical stress.18
The simple upregulation of certain genes may lead to muscle hyperexcitability and evoke TrPs in muscles. For example, L-type and N-type Ca2+ channels are upregulated by factors associated with physical and psychological stress,19,20 as well as by nicotine.21 Patients with TrPs and long-term musculoskeletal pain should avoid tobacco smoking, as well as excess caffeine.22 Caffeine upregulates activity at motor end plates by acting as an agonist of ryanodine receptors23 and an antagonist of adenosine A2A receptors.24
Motor End Plate Dysfunction Cascade
When a motor end plate becomes dysfunctional, several perverse mechanisms
cause it to persist as a TrP. The excessive muscle contraction compresses
local sensory nerves, which reduces the axoplasmic transport of molecules that
normally inhibit ACh
release.25,26
The sustained muscle contraction also compresses local blood vessels, reducing
the local supply of oxygen. This impaired circulation, combined with the
increased metabolic demands generated by contracted muscles, results in a
rapid depletion of local adenosine triphosphate (ATP). The resultant
"ATP energy
crisis"5
triggers presynaptic and postsynaptic decompensations. In the nerve terminal,
ATP directly inhibits ACh
release,27 so
depletion of ATP increases ACh release. In the muscle cell, ATP powers the
Ca2+ pump, which returns calcium to the sarcoplasmic reticulum.
Hence, loss of ATP impairs the reuptake of Ca2+, which increases
contractile activitya vicious
cycle.9
The ATP energy crisis cascades into a local release of chemicals that activate or sensitize nociceptive nerves in the region, including bradykinins, cytokines, serotonin, histamine, potassium, prostaglandins, leukotrienes, somatostatin, and substance P.9 This chemical activation and sensitization of nociceptors accounts for TrP tenderness. Sensitizing substances may also generate a focal demyelination of sensory nerves. Demyelination creates abnormal impulsegenerating sites (AIGS) capable of generating ectopic nociceptive impulses.28
CNS and Biomechanical Factors
The CNS and biomechanical factors also contribute to the formation and
maintenance of TrPs. A persistent barrage of nociceptive signals from TrPs
will eventually sensitize the CNS, a process termed central
sensitization. This process accelerates in the presence of AIGS and their
associated ephaptic crosstalk (cross-excitation) with neighboring autonomic
nerves. Travell and Simons' view of the CNS as an "integrator" of
TrPs is interchangeable with Korr's
description29 of
the CNS as an "organizer" of somatic dysfunction. According to
Travell and Simons, the sensitized dorsal horn becomes a "neurologic
lens," consolidating other nociceptive signals converging on the same
segment of the spinal cord, including other somatic dysfunctions and visceral
dysfunctions.5
Biomechanical factors that stress muscles (eg, acute trauma, repetitive microtrauma) contribute to TrP dysfunction. Further, biomechanical stress of a cold muscle is a key factor in the formation of TrPs,3-5 as cooling muscles apparently upregulate nAChR activity at the motor end plates.30 The revised edition of Travell and Simons' manual emphasizes the relationship between TrPs and nearby articular dysfunctions. In the manual, the authors correlate suboccipital TrPs with occipitoatlantal (OA) dysfunctions, semispinalis capitus TrPs with OA dysfunctions and atlantoaxial dysfunctions, and splenius TrPs with upper thoracic articular dysfunctions.5
Postural disorders often contribute to the perpetuation of TrPs. For example, postural strain of the suboccipital muscles may cause TrPs in these muscles,5 leading to further deterioration in muscle structure and function. Such deterioration may result in radiating pain (Figure 1) and atrophic changes.31 Suboccipital muscles contain a high density of proprioceptors,32 so atrophic changes lead to a loss in proprioceptive balance and loss of proprioceptive "gate control" at the dorsal horn, giving rise to chronic pain syndromes.31
Considerations for Osteopathic Medicine
Twenty years ago, Travell and Simons treated TrPs with "ischemic
compression" by applying heavy thumb pressure on TrPs, sufficient to
produce skin
blanching.3 In the
1999 edition, Travell and Simons recommend applying gentle digital pressure to
TrPs.5 This
fundamental change is anchored in Travell's ATP energy crisis model, which
characterizes TrPs as centers of tissue hypoxia. Thus, deep digital pressure
that produces additional ischemia is not beneficial. Travell and Simons named
their new technique "trigger point pressure
release."5
Applying a "press and stretch" technique is believed to restore
abnormally contracted sarcomeres in the contraction knot to their normal
resting length. It is an indirect technique that uses the barrier-release
concept, in which the finger "follows" the releasing tissue.
During the past 20 years, Travell and Simons developed an appreciation for OMT, though they learned of it from European allopathic physicians. The authors began treating TrPs with a muscle-energy technique they called the "Lewit technique."3 Karl Lewit, MD, from the Czech Republic, developed his technique after working with Fred L. Mitchell, Jr, DO, Philip E. Greenman, DO, and other osteopathic physicians.33 A Dutch variation of Lewit's method, the "Gaymans-Lewit technique," evolved after Gaymans met osteopathic physicians in New York City in the early 1970s.34 Travell and Simons subsequently cited Mitchell and Greenman and described muscle energy and myofascial release.4
Travell and Simons' revised edition of their manual advocates muscle energy, counterstrain, myofascial release, and other OMT techniques for treating TrPs and associated articular somatic dysfunctions.5 In addition, high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust techniques are illustrated, hearkening back to Travell's early interest in spinal manipulation.1
Other New Approaches for Treating TrPs
Travell and Simons recommend dimethisoquin hydrochloride ointment (Quotane)
for massaging TrPs in superficial muscles such as the orbicularis oculi,
frontalis, and
occipitalis.3
Dimethisoquin, a local anesthetic, inhibits voltage-gated Na(+) channels
(conferring its anesthetic effect) but also acts as a noncompetitive inhibitor
of nAChRs (IC50 = 2.4
µM).35 The
anesthetic's potency is significantly greater than that of lidocaine (IC50 =
52 µM) and procaine (IC50 = 240 µM). Further, dimethisoquine is uniquely
selective for the nAChR subtype expressed in the neuromuscular junction.
Massage with capsaicin cream (0.075%, available over the counter) is useful for treating TrPs located in surgical scars,36 which are particularly refractory to treatment.5 Capsaicin selectively binds to the vanilloid receptor (VR1).37 Vanilloid-receptor activation triggers an influx of Ca2+ into neuron terminals, which initiates neurotransmitter release. Repeated exposure to capsaicin, however, causes VR1s to become desensitized. This mechanism explains the seemingly paradoxical use of capsaicin as an analgesic.36-38 Vanilloid receptors are also expressed in brain regions that modulate the emotive and cognitive aspects of pain (eg, preoptic area, locus ceruleus, hypothalamus, striatum).38 It has been hypothesized that modulating the expression of VR1s and their endogenous ligand (anandamide) may be one of the central mechanisms of OMT,38 parallel to the potential effects of OMT on endorphins.39
Needling is sometimes necessary to inactivate TrPs. For thousands of years, Chinese medicine has treated TrPs with acupuncture.40 Travell began needling TrPs with syringes in 1942, injecting them with procaine.41 Procaine was later replaced by saline solution,42 which was later replaced by "dry needling"without any fluid in the syringe43bringing the procedure full circle to what is essentially acupuncture. The "dysfunctional motor end plate hypothesis" has led to the injection of botulinum toxin, which causes an irreversible blockade of ACh release in the TrP.44
Injecting TrPs with quinidine should be tested in a clinical trial, as quinidine decreases presynaptic ACh release (via its well-known blockade of L-type Ca2+ channels) and down-regulates nAChRs (a postsynaptic mechanism). In one trial, quinidine appeared to restore AChE activity.45 Diltiazem also merits investigation. It is an L-type Ca2+ channel blocking agent that corrects myopathies caused by defects in AChE activity.46
Travell and Simons recommended a diet adequate in vitamins and minerals for the prevention of TrPs.3 Supplementing the diet with phosphatidylcholine has been recommended,47 but this may actually provoke TrPs in a portion of patients. As choline is a percursor to ACh, an nAChR gain-of-function mutation may enable choline to directly activate the mutated receptors.48
Another new approach in treating TrPs are herbal medications. As an estimated 50% of patients with long-term musculoskeletal pain take herbal remedies, it behooves osteopathic physicians to understand the mechanisms of these medications.49 Herbal remedies and essential oils that are recommended for treating myofascial pain include lavender (Lavandula angustifolia), lemon balm (Melissa officinalis), rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), kava kava (Piper methysticum), skullcap (Scutellaria lateriflora), passionflower (Passiflora incarnata), Rose (Rosa spp), and valerian (Valeriana officinalis).47 Nearly all of these herbs contain linalool, a monoterpene compound that inhibits end plate activity by reducing ACh release (a presynaptic mechanism) and by modifing nAChRs (a postsynaptic mechanism).50 Marijuana (Cannabis spp), which also produces linalool,51 also effectively treats myofascial pain syndromes.52 Marijuana's efficacy may also be attributed to tetrahydrocannabinol, an N-type Ca2+ channel blocker.53 Tetrahydrocannabinol inhibits ACh release in the CNS54; this inhibition is thought to occur at motor end plates, as motor nerve terminals express cannabinoid receptors.54
Conclusion
Travell and Simons'concepts regarding TrPs have converged with osteopathic
medicine's concept of somatic dysfunction. This convergence is also seen in
Travell and Simons' approach to the treatment of TrPs, which in many ways
resembles the OMT used in Chapman reflex
points,55 Jones'
counterstrain
points,56 and the
progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures (PINS)
technique.57 Armed
with a better understanding of the molecular basis underlying myofascial pain
syndromes, clinicians hope that Travell and Simons' approach will continue to
coevolve with osteopathic concepts.
From Unitec Institute of Technology in Auckland, New Zealand.
References
2. Travell JG. Office Hours: Day and Night; The
Autobiography of Janet Travell, MD. New York, NY: World
Publishing Co; 1968.
3. Travell JG, Simons DG. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction:
The Trigger Point Manual: The Upper Extremities. Vol.1
. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins;1983
.
4. Travell JG, Simons DG. Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction:
The Trigger Point Manual: The Lower Extremities. Vol.2
. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins;1992
.
5. Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS. Travell and Simons'
Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction: The Trigger Point Manual. Vol1
. Upper Half of Body. 2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams
& Wilkins; 1999.
6. Hsieh CY, Hong CZ, Adams AH, et al. Interexaminer reliability of
the palpation of trigger points in the trunk and lower limb muscles.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2000; 81:258
-264.[Medline]
7. McPartland JM, Goodridge JP. Counterstrain diagnostics and
traditional osteopathic examination of the cervical spine compared.
Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies.1997; 1(3):173
-178.
8. Kuchera ML, McPartland JM. Myofascial trigger points as somatic
dysfunction. In: Foundations for Osteopathic Medicine.
2nd ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
9. Mense S, Simons DG. Muscle Pain: Understanding its
Nature, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott
Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
10. Hubbard DR, Berkoff GM. Myofascial trigger points show spontaneous
needle EMG activity. Spine.1993; 18:1803
-1807.[Medline]
11. Gunn CC, Milbrandt WE. Tenderness at motor points: an aid in the
diagnosis of pain in the shoulder referred from the cervical spine.
J Am Osteopath Assoc.1977; 77:196
-212.[Medline]
12. Pellegrino MJ, Waylonis GW, Sommer A. Familiar occurrence of
primary fibromyalgia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1989; 70:61
-63.[Medline]
13. Ohno K, Engel AG. Congenital myasthenic syndromes: genetic defects
of the neuromuscular junction. Curr Neurol Neurosci
Rep. 2002;2:78
-88.[Medline]
14. Losavio A, Muchnik S. Spontaneous acetylcholine release in
mammalian neuromuscular junctions. Am J Physiol.1997; 273:C1835
-1841.
15. Gentry CL, Lukas RJ. Local anesthetics noncompetitively inhibit
function of four distinct nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther.2001; 299:1038
-1048.
16. Lester HA, Karshin A. Gain of function mutants: ion channels and G
protein-coupled receptors. Annu Rev Neurosci.2000; 23:89
-125.[Medline]
17. Massoulie J, Anselmet A, Bon S, et al. The polymorphism of
acetylcholinesterase: post-translational processing, quaternary associations
and localization. Chem Biol Interact.1999; 119-120:29
-42.[Medline]
18. Grisaru D, Sternfeld M, Eldor A, et al. Structural roles of
acetylcholinesterase variants in biology and pathology. Eur J
Biochem. 1999;264:672
-686.[Medline]
19. Baldelli P, Magnelli V, Carbone E. Selective up-regulation of P-
and R-type Ca2+ channels in rat embryo motoneurons by BDNF. Eur J
Neurosci. 1999;11:1127
-1133.[Medline]
20. Arenson MS, Evans SC. Activation of protein kinase C increases
acetylcholine release from frog motor nerves by a direct action on L-type
Ca(2+) channels and apparently not by depolarisation of the terminal.
Neuroscience.2001; 104:1157
-1164.[Medline]
21. Katsura M, Mohri Y, Shuto K, et al. Up-regulation of L-type
voltage-dependent calcium channels after long term exposure to nicotine in
cerebral cortical neurons. J Biol Chem.2002; 277:7979
-7988.
22. McPartland JM, Mitchell J. Caffeine and chronic back pain.
Arch Physical Med Rehab.1997; 78:61
-63.
23. Nishimura M, Tsubaki K, Yagasaki O, et al. Ryanodine facilitates
calcium-dependent release of transmitter at mouse neuromuscular junctions.
Br J Pharmacol.1990; 100:114
-118.[Medline]
24. Oliveira L, Timoteo MA, Correia-de-Sa P. Modulation by adenosine of
both muscarinic M1-facilitation and M2-inhibition of [3H]-acetylcholine
release from the rat motor nerve terminals. Eur J
Neurosci. 2002;15:1728
-1736.[Medline]
25. Hohmann AG, Herkenham M. Cannabinoid receptors undergo axonal flow
in sensory nerves. Neuroscience.1999; 92:1171
-1175.[Medline]
26. Gessa GL, Casu MA, Carta G, et al. Cannabinoids decrease
acetylcholine release in the medial-prefrontal cortex and hippocampus.
Eur J Pharmacol.1998; 355:119
-124.[Medline]
27. Giniatullin RA, Sokolova EM. ATP and adenosine inhibit transmitter
release at the frog neuromuscular junction through distinct presynaptic
receptors. Br J Pharmacol.1998; 124:839
-844.[Medline]
28. Butler DS. The Sensitive Nervous System.
Adelaide, Australia: Noigroup Publications; 2000.
29. Korr IM. The spinal cord as organizer of disease processes. In:
Peterson B, ed. The Collected Papers of Irvin M. Korr.
Newark, Ohio: American Academy of Osteopathy; 1979:207
-221.
30. Foldes FF, Kuze S, Vizi ES, et al. The influence of temperature on
neuromuscular performance. J Neural Transm.1978; 43:27
-45.
31. McPartland JM, Brodeur R, Hallgren RC. Chronic neck pain, standing
balance, and suboccipital muscle atrophy. J Manip Physiol
Therapeut. 1997;21:24
-29.
32. Peck D, Buxton DF, Nitz A. A comparison of spindle concentrations
in large and small muscles acting in parallel combinations. J
Morphology. 1984;180:243
-252.
33. Lewit K. Postisometrische Relaxation in Kombination mit anderen Mes
muskularer Fazilitation und Inhibition. Manuelle
Medizin. 1986;24:30
-34.
34. Greenman PE. In memoriam: F.H.C. Gaymans. J Manual
Medicine. 1988;3:158
.
35. Gentry CL, Lukas RJ Local anesthetics noncompetitively inhibit
function of four distinct nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther.2001; 299:1038
-1048.
36. McPartland JM. Use of capsaicin cream for abdominal wall scar pain.
Am Fam Physician.2002; 65:2211
-2212.[Medline]
37. Di Marzo V, Bisogno T, De Petrocellis L, et al. Highly selective
cannabinoid receptor ligands and novel vanilloid receptor "hybrid"
ligands. Biochem Biophys Res Commun.2001; 281:444
-451.[Medline]
38. McPartland JM, Pruitt PL. Sourcing the code: searching for the
evolutionary origins of cannabinoid receptors, vanilloid receptors, and
anandamide. J Canna Therapeut.2002; 2:73
-103.
39. Vernon HT, Dhami MS, Howley TP, et al. Spinal manipulation and
beta-endorphin: a controlled study of the effect of a spinal manipulation on
plasma beta-endorphin levels in normal males. J Manipulative
Physiol Ther. 1986;9:115
-123.[Medline]
40. Riland WK, Peterson BE. Chinese acupuncture: a firsthand view.
Health. 1972 Dec:9
-14.
41. Travell J, Rinzler S, Herman M. Pain and disability of the shoulder
and arm: treatment by intramuscular infiltration with procaine hydrochloride.
JAMA. 1942;120:417
-422.
42. Sola AE, Kuitert JH. Myofascial trigger point pain in the neck and
shoulder girdle. Northwest Med.1955; 54:980
-984.[Medline]
43. Kraus H. Clinical Treatment of Back and Neck
Pain. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1970.
44. Cheshire WP, Abashian SW, Mann JD. Botulinum toxin in the treatment
of myofascial pain syndrome. Pain.1994; 59:65
-69.[Medline]
45. De Bleecker JL, Meire VI, Pappens S. Quinidine prevents
paraoxon-induced necrotizing myopathy in rats.
Neurotoxicology.1998; 19:833
-838.[Medline]
46. Meshul CK. Calcium channel blocker reverses
anticholinesterase-induced myopathy. Brain Res.1989; 497:142
-148.[Medline]
47. Starlanyl D, Copeland M. Fibromyalgia and Chronic
Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Survival Manual. Oakland, Calif: New
Harbinger Publications Inc; 1996.
48. Zhou M, Engel AG, Auerbach A. Serum choline activates mutant
acetylcholine receptors that cause slow channel congenital myasthenic
syndromes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1999; 96:10466
-10471.
49. Berger J. Vermont DO urges peers to learn about herbal medicine.
The DO.1999; 40(3):58
-60.
50. Re L, Barocci S, Sonnino S, et al. Linalool modifies the nicotinic
receptorion channel kinetics at the mouse neuromuscular junction.
Pharmacol Res.2000; 42:177
-182.[Medline]
51. McPartland JM, Pruitt PP. Side effects of pharmaceuticals not
elicited by comparable herbal medicines: the case of tetrahydrocannabinol and
marijuana. Altern Ther Health Med.1999; 5(4):57
-62.
52. Grinspoon L, Bakalar JB. Marihuana, the Forbidden
Medicine. Rev ed. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press;1997
.
53. Twitchell W, Brown S, Mackie K. Cannabinoids inhibit N- and
P/Q-type calcium channels in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. J
Neurophysiol. 1997;78:43
-50.
54. Van der Kloot W. Anandamide, a naturally-occurring agonist of the
cannabinoid receptor, blocks adenylate cyclase at the frog neuromuscular
junction. Brain Res.1994; 649:181
-184.[Medline]
55. Owens C. An Endocrine Interpretation of Chapman's
Reflexes. 2nd ed. Chattanooga, Tenn: Chattanooga Printing &
Engraving Co; 1937.
56. Jones LH. Strain and Counterstrain. Newark,
Ohio: American Academy of Osteopathy; 1981.
57. Dowling DJ. Progressive inhibition of neuromuscular structures
(PINS) technique. J Am Osteopath Assoc.100
: 285-298.
58. Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell, TM. Principles of Neural
Science. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2000.
1. Travell W, Travell JG. Technic for reduction and ambulatory
treatment of sacroiliac displacement. Arch Phys Ther.1942; 23:222
-232.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |