JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, F.
Right arrow Articles by Naglieri, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kelly, F.
Right arrow Articles by Naglieri, R
Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol 99, Issue 9, 470-470
Copyright © 1999 by American Osteopathic Association

Articles

A review of alternative birthing positions

FW Kelly, R Terry, and R Naglieri

This article reviews a number of nonevidenced-based studies that have been conducted on the different physical positions of labor and delivery. A review of the literature disclosed that the traditional supine position appeared to be associated with a prolonged second stage of labor and persistence of occiput posterior presentations. However, the supine and left lateral positions are excellent for providing anesthesia and access, although there may be a little added benefit for the parturient's comfort. The sitting, squatting, and hands-and-knees positions offer superior patient participation. The squatting position held for a long time may be physically stressful. The sitting and standing positions are known for occasional excessive hemorrhage and added expense. The hands-and-knees position offers the advantages of the gravitation effect of the upright positions and may be associated with less perineal damage. Overall, there has been no report of any harm to the infant when alternative positions are used.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
S. C. A. Michel, A. Rake, K. Treiber, B. Seifert, R. Chaoui, R. Huch, B. Marincek, and R. A. Kubik-Huch
MR Obstetric Pelvimetry: Effect of Birthing Position on Pelvic Bony Dimensions
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2002; 179(4): 1063 - 1067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the American Osteopathic Association.