JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lockwood, M.
Right arrow Articles by Degenhardt, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lockwood, M.
Right arrow Articles by Degenhardt, B.
Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol 98, Issue 1, 35-35
Copyright © 1998 by American Osteopathic Association

Articles

Cycle-to-cycle variability attributed to the primary respiratory mechanism

MD Lockwood and BF Degenhardt

Wave forms attributed to the primary respiratory mechanism (PRM), as published by Viola Frymann, DO, in JAOA June 1971, were analyzed for an undescribed parameter, cycle-to-cycle variability. Tracings from this paper were independently measured by two physicians focusing on the duration of each cycle. Consistency of the measurements and interexaminer agreement were shown. The duration of individual cycles demonstrated significant cycle-to-cycle variability ranging from 0.6 second up to 6.3 seconds. The reason for variability as well as its clinical significance is unknown. The minute rate of each tracing ranged from 6.5 to 13.8 cycles per minute (0.108 to 0.230 Hz [corrected]), mean 10.8 +/- 2.3 (0.180 +/- 0.038 Hz [corrected]). (Different minute rates attributed to the PRM have been reported in other studies.) Although variability is an innate characteristic of biologic cycles, this phenomenon has not been previously reported for the PRM. The authors suggest that this variability has likely confounded previous interexaminer reliability studies and should be considered in any future studies of this type. Determination of causes of this variability present timely and fruitful avenues of research.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
K. E. Nelson, N. Sergueef, and T. Glonek
Recording the Rate of the Cranial Rhythmic Impulse
J Am Osteopath Assoc, June 1, 2006; 106(6): 337 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1998 by the American Osteopathic Association.