JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, S.
Right arrow Articles by Kurtz, J.
Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol 97, Issue 2, 80-80
Copyright © 1997 by American Osteopathic Association

Articles

Variables influencing the use of osteopathic manipulative treatment in family practice

SM Johnson, ME Kurtz, and JC Kurtz

A questionnaire was mailed to 2000 randomly selected osteopathic physicians to assess use of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT). In all, 1055 responses were summarized for the study. The contention is supported that OMT is being used less and less by practicing physicians. Only 6% of the respondents treated more than 50% of their patients with OMT, and nearly one third used OMT on less than 5% of their patients. A progressive de-emphasis of OMT use correlated with more recent graduation from osteopathic medical colleges. Thirty-eight percent of the variance regarding OMT use was attributed to two factors: barriers to use, and OMT protocol used. Perceptions by physicians of insufficient OMT training were not predictive of decreased use of OMT. Significantly more OMT was used in solo practice as opposed to other settings. The results present a wake-up call for the osteopathic medical profession. The profession must strive to remove barriers that preclude OMT use by justifying to policymakers, health professionals, and the public the cost-benefits of OMT in holistic healthcare.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
L. H. Calabrese
Sir William Osler Then and Now: Thoughts for the Osteopathic Profession
J Am Osteopath Assoc, May 1, 2005; 105(5): 245 - 249.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
F. J. Rogers
Advancing a Traditional View of Osteopathic Medicine Through Clinical Practice
J Am Osteopath Assoc, May 1, 2005; 105(5): 255 - 259.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
D. W. Saxon, G. Tunnicliff, J. J. Brokaw, and B. U. Raess
Status of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in the Osteopathic Medical School Curriculum
J Am Osteopath Assoc, March 1, 2004; 104(3): 121 - 126.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. D. Howell
The Paradox of Osteopathy
N. Engl. J. Med., November 4, 1999; 341(19): 1465 - 1468.
[Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1997 by the American Osteopathic Association.