JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross-Lee, B
Right arrow Articles by Weiser, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross-Lee, B
Right arrow Articles by Weiser, M.
Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol 96, Issue 8, 473-473
Copyright © 1996 by American Osteopathic Association

Articles

Transforming osteopathic medical education

B Ross-Lee, LE Kiss, and MA Weiser

The evolution of the healthcare marketplace to a managed care-based system requires dramatic changes in the fragmented medical education infrastructure and curricula to more adequately train the physician workforce needed to staff and support the new system. Graduating physicians, in large numbers, feel poorly prepared to function effectively in the very areas adjudged to be essential to a successful transition, such as cost-effective care and caring for patients in outpatient settings. Managers of the new systems, such as health maintenance organizations, have expressed dissatisfaction with the skill levels of many of the practitioners whom they are hiring. Many physicians who have made the transition to a new practice paradigm by restructuring their practices are dissatisfied with several aspects of the new practice environment and equally concerned about the quality of care they can deliver. The conflict between rhetoric and incentives, and the difficulty of reforming a fragmented academic system pose barriers to effective change as the nation's academic health centers prepare to respond. Osteopathic medicine is better positioned to change because of its community-based education, its track record in primary care, and its national move to create a vertically integrated continuum of education from undergraduate through graduate study. Medical education and workforce issues are essential components of the cost, quality, and access triad. Without reform in medical education, the ability of the new paradigm to adequately address these other issues is critically compromised.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
A.-V. O. Griffin and S. Sweet
Undergraduate Osteopathic Medical Education: Addressing the Impact of College Growth on the Applicant Pool and Student Enrollment
J Am Osteopath Assoc, February 1, 2006; 106(2): 51 - 57.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Osteopathic Association.