JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Craig, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Teitelbaum, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Craig, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Teitelbaum, H
Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol 96, Issue 8, 461-461
Copyright © 1996 by American Osteopathic Association

Articles

Serum estradiol in the differential diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy

ZG Craig, JM Ramey, MW Rochowiak, LH Brown, and H Teitelbaum

In a prospective study using a cutoff value of 140 pg/mL, serum estradiol 17-beta assay had a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 100% in differentiating ectopic pregnancy (6 patients) from normal pregnancy with threatened abortion proceeding to viability (7 patients). In differentiating threatened abortion from spontaneous abortion (9 patients), the estradiol assay had a sensitivity of 88.9% and a specificity of 100%. All but one of the patients with ectopic pregnancy had estradiol levels below the cutoff value of 140 pg/mL, as did all but one of the patients who had spontaneous abortion. All the patients who had threatened abortion that progressed to viability had values well above the cutoff level. The mean estradiol values for the viable pregnancy group were significantly different from those of the other two groups. These data suggest that, at the institution where this study was done, serum estradiol determinations may be of value in the differentiation of both ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortion from threatened abortion but appears to be of very limited usefulness in distinguishing ectopic pregnancy from spontaneous abortion. The validity of these conclusions is limited by the small number of subjects. Further studies comprising greater numbers of subjects are needed.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1996 by the American Osteopathic Association.