|
|
||||||||
Articles |
To evaluate interexaminer agreement on palpatory diagnostic findings, we compared interexaminer results, patient disability self-evaluations, and assessment of patients' progress by referring physicians. Three examiners (two clinicians and a third-year osteopathic medical student fellow) monitored patients' progress using negotiated examination procedures. The patients were examined independently by each examiner at each of eight weekly visits. Patients completed a disability assessment form at each visit, and the referring physicians recorded changes in their patients' condition. The patients' disability self-rating and examiner test results did not show clear correlation. There was a 62.2% agreement between the two physician examiners when the general descriptors "improvement," "no change," or "aggravation" were used. The student examiner's agreement with the clinician examiners was 60.2% and 51.8%. Interexaminer agreement of findings from osteopathic testing procedures appears to depend on general clinical experience and specific experience with the testing procedures.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. R. Bush and J. Vorro Kinematic Measures to Objectify Head and Neck Motions in Palpatory Diagnosis: A Pilot Study J Am Osteopath Assoc, February 1, 2008; 108(2): 55 - 62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. P. Lesho An Overview of Osteopathic Medicine Arch Fam Med, November 1, 1999; 8(6): 477 - 484. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |