JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Land, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kushner, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Land, D.
Right arrow Articles by Kushner, R
Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol 90, Issue 5, 421-421
Copyright © 1990 by American Osteopathic Association

Articles

Drug abuse during pregnancy in an inner-city hospital: prevalence and patterns

DB Land and R Kushner

Because of the increase of illicit drug use within the inner city--and especially because of the increasing popularity of cocaine--Michigan Health Center (Detroit) implemented a policy of routine drug screening of all patients admitted to the hospital through the labor unit. This policy was first implemented in February 1989. Routine drug screening made it possible to perform a retrospective study of the prevalence and patterns of drug abuse in a population consisting predominantly of inner-city patients of minority origin and indigent circumstance. The data derived from drug screening on 290 patients performed over a 75-day period are evaluated. Urine samples were screened for amphetamines, barbiturates, benzodiazepines, cannabinoids, cocaine, and opiates. Nearly 27% of the urine samples tested positive for one or more of these substances. Cannabinoids and cocaine were found most frequently. Mandatory drug screening of pregnant patients by inner-city hospitals may be warranted. No statistically significant difference was noted (P less than or equal to .05) with respect to the average age, education, and number of prenatal visits of illicit substance users compared with those of nonusers.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NeoReviewsHome page
D. Chan, J. Klein, and G. Koren
New Methods for Neonatal Drug Screening
NeoReviews, September 1, 2003; 4(9): e236 - 244.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Osteopathic Association.