JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tedesco, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tedesco, J.
Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, Vol 89, Issue 4, 461-461
Copyright © 1989 by American Osteopathic Association

Articles

Comparison of midforceps, low-forceps, and spontaneous vaginal deliveries

JH Tedesco

A prospective, six-month study compared various maternal and neonatal parameters among spontaneous vaginal (n = 47), low-forceps (n = 21), and midforceps (n = 15) deliveries. All three groups had good neonatal and maternal outcomes. The only significant differences (P greater than .01) were the one-minute Apgar scores between the low-forceps and midforceps groups and parity between the spontaneous vaginal and low-forceps deliveries. The findings did not reveal poorer neonatal outcomes or excessive maternal morbidity, thus supporting the continued use of forceps in properly selected patients.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Osteopathic Association.