JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JAOA • Vol 109 • No 4 • April 2009 • 234-236
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Novi, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Novi, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Morgan, M. A.

BRIEF REPORT

Combined Anal Sphincteroplasty and Perineal Reconstruction for Fecal Incontinence in Women

Joseph M. Novi, DO; Beth H.K. Mulvihill, DO; Mark A. Morgan, MD

From Riverside Methodist Hospital (Dr Novi) and private practice (Dr Mulvihill) in Columbus, Ohio, and from the Fox Chase Cancer Center in Philadelphia, Pa (Dr Morgan).

Address correspondence to Joseph M. Novi, DO, Director of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery, Riverside Methodist Hospital, 3545 Olentangy River Rd, Suite 501, North Medical Building, Columbus, OH 43214-3907. E-mail: jnovi{at}ohiohealth.com

Context: Although success rates are limited, anal sphincteroplasty is commonly used to treat women with fecal incontinence.

Objectives: To investigate the long-term efficacy of a novel surgical procedure—sphincteroplasty with perineal reconstruction—for the management of fecal incontinence.

Methods: The current prospective study comprised women presenting to the Division of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery at Riverside Methodist Hospital in Columbus, Ohio, with fecal incontinence and anterior external anal sphincter disruption. Endoanal ultrasonography was used in the presurgical evaluation of anal sphincters. Sphincteroplasty was completed in an end-to-end manner and perineoplasty in a standardized fashion.

Results: Twenty women participated in the present study. Four patients (20%) had prior surgery (sphincteroplasty or rectocele repair) for fecal incontinence. Before surgery, 15 patients (75%) were incontinent of solid stool, and all 20 patients had incontinence of liquid stool and flatus. The mean number of incontinence episodes was 3 per week (range, 1-8 per week). At 3-year postsurgical follow-up, all 20 patients were continent of solid stool, 18 (90%) were continent of liquid stool, and 10 (50%) were continent of flatus.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this pilot study, anal sphincteroplasty with modified perineoplasty appears to have acceptable long-term results for the treatment of women with fecal incontinence and anatomic anal sphincter defects.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Osteopathic Association.