JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

JAOA • Vol 109 • No 2 • February 2009 • 79-85
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zegarra-Parodi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Renard, E.-O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zegarra-Parodi, R.
Right arrow Articles by Renard, E.-O.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Cranial Palpation Pressures Used by Osteopathy Students: Effects of Standardized Protocol Training

 Rafael Zegarra-Parodi, DO (England), MEd; Pierre de Chauvigny de Blot, DO (England); Luke D. Rickards, MOsteo (Australia); Edouard-Olivier Renard, DO (France), MEd

From the Research Department at Centre Européen d'Enseignement Supérieur de l'Ostéopathie in Paris, France (Mr Zegarra-Parodi, Mr de Chauvigny de Blot, and Mr Renard), and from private practice in Adelaide, Australia (Mr Rickards).

Address correspondence to Rafael Zegarra-Parodi, DO, MEd, Centre Européen d'Enseignement Supérieur de l'Ostéopathie, 175 Boulevard Anatole France, 93200 Saint Denis, Paris, France. E-mail: rzp{at}ceeso.com

Context: Descriptions of subtle palpatory perceptions in osteopathic cranial palpation can be misperceived by students. Thus, adequate dissemination and replication of cranial palpatory techniques is challenging for osteopathy students.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of standardized protocol training on cranial palpation of the frontomalar suture.

Methods: Fourth-year osteopathy students from the European Center for Osteopathic Higher Education in Paris, France, were recruited and randomly divided into three groups. Students in the study group received instruction in a standardized protocol for palpatory assessment of the frontomalar suture; students in the control group did not receive instruction; and the remaining students acted as subjects. A specialized force sensor was placed on the skin covering the left frontomalar suture of each subject. Student practitioners were instructed to palpate subjects' left frontomalar suture using the customary pressure described for evaluation and treatment of somatic dysfunction of the cranium. Pressure measurements were exported to a laptop computer.

Results: Twelve students were in each group. Student practitioners' palpation pressures ranged from 0.19 to 1.12 N/cm2, while mean palpation pressures for each test ranged from 0.27 to 0.98 N/cm2. The mean (SD) palpation pressure in the study group and control group was 0.55 N/cm2 (0.16 N/cm2) and 0.53 N/cm2 (0.15 N/cm2), respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in mean palpation pressures used by the two groups. Substantial variation in test performance was noted in both groups.

Conclusion: Palpatory training was ineffective in improving student practitioners' precision of cranial palpation performance. Quantitative feedback of palpation pressures during training may improve outcomes. To our knowledge, data on palpation pressures used during osteopathic cranial manipulation have not been reported previously in the medical literature.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Osteopathic Association.