JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JAOA • Vol 106 • No 11 • November 2006 • 658-662
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, P. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krueger, P. M.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Teaching Critical Appraisal: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Outcomes Trial in Undergraduate Osteopathic Medical Education

Paul M. Krueger, DO

Address correspondence to Paul M. Krueger, DO, FACOOG, Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, University of New Jersey–School of Osteopathic Medicine, One Medical Center Dr, Suite 210, Stratford, NJ 08084-1500. E-mail: krueger{at}umdnj.edu

Context: Critical appraisal is an important skill for medical students. A proposed curriculum may be an effective teaching tool.

Objective: To determine whether the teaching of critical appraisal can be successfully introduced into an osteopathic clinical clerkship in obstetrics and gynecology.

Design: Osteopathic medical students (N=77) were assigned by lottery to one of eight rotation groups during their clinical clerkship in obstetrics and gynecology. Four of these rotation groups received instruction in critical appraisal (study group; received evidence-based medicine [EBM] curriculum; n=38); the other four rotation groups did not (control group; received non-EBM; n=39). The ability of the study EBM group to critically analyze the literature was compared with that of the control (non-EBM) group on the basis of results of a multiple-choice examination.

Setting: The University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey–School of Osteopathic Medicine clinical clerkship in obstetrics and gynecology.

Results: The median scores for critical analysis were 41 for the control group and 64 for the study group. This difference was statistically significant (P<.001).

Conclusion: The teaching of critical appraisal can be successfully introduced into a clerkship in obstetrics and gynecology.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Dent EducHome page
A. E. Levine, R. D. Bebermeyer, J.-W. Chen, D. Davis, and C. Harty
Development of an Interdisciplinary Course in Information Resources and Evidence-Based Dentistry
J Dent Educ., September 1, 2008; 72(9): 1067 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Osteopathic Association.