JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JAOA • Vol 106 • No 10 • October 2006 • 605-608
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bezilla, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hayes, N. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bezilla, T. A.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Incidence of Iatrogenesis Associated With Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment of Pediatric Patients

Natalie M. Hayes, DO; Todd A. Bezilla, DO

From the Yale University School of Medicine (Hayes) in New Haven, Conn. Dr Bezilla is in private practice in Wilmington, Del. This study was conducted when both authors were at the Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, Philadelphia (Pa) College of Osteopathic Medicine.

Address correspondence to Natalie M. Hayes, DO, 66 Montoya Dr, Branford, CT 06405-2528. E-mail: nhayesdo{at}aol.com

Context: Although studies have been published documenting the safety and efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in adults, no studies exist documenting the safety of OMT in pediatric patients.

Objective: To determine the incidence of iatrogenesis (ie, aggravations and complications) derived from OMT in the pediatric patient population.

Design: A retrospective review of medical records was conducted looking for documentation of aggravations or complications subsequent to OMT. Treatment-associated aggravations were defined as worsening of symptoms or complaints after treatment. Treatment complications were defined as cerebrovascular accidents, dislocation, fracture, pneumothorax, sprains and strains, or death as a treatment outcome. The authors documented all occurrences of treatment-associated aggravations or complications recorded at each office visit, as well as the timing of an aggravation between office visits.

Setting: Medical records of pediatric patients receiving OMT and being seen more than twice at osteopathic manipulative medicine offices in Pennsylvania and Virginia were reviewed.

Patients: Of 502 pediatric patients' medical records reviewed, 346 met the inclusion criteria of two or more office visits for which adequate follow-up data were available.

Results: No treatment-associated complications were documented. Thirty-one (9%) patients had documented treatment-associated aggravations. There was no significant difference between the proportion of male and female patients considered in the study, relative to a 50/50 distribution (females, 48%; males, 52%).

Conclusions: Osteopathic manipulative treatment appears to be a safe treatment modality in the pediatric population when administered by physicians with expertise in OMT. Future studies should be prospective and include larger numbers of patients to document the safety of OMT in this clinical application.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Osteopathic Association.