JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JAOA • Vol 104 • No 7 • July 2004 • 281-287
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rohr, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Clements, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rohr, C. I.
Right arrow Articles by Clements, J. M.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Prevalence of Prevention and Treatment Modalities Used in Populations at Risk of Osteoporosis

Christine I. Rohr, DO; Arup Sarkar, MD; Kimberly R. Barber, PhD; John M. Clements, MPA

From the Departments of Medical Education (Rohr), Family Medicine (Sarkar), and Research (Clements) at the Synergy Medical Education Alliance at the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine in Saginaw, and the Research Department at the College's Hurley Medical Center (Barber) in Flint.

Address correspondence to John M. Clements, MPA, Synergy Medical Education Alliance, 1000 Houghton Ave, Saginaw, MI 48602-5303.E-mail: jclements{at}synergymedical.org

Study Objective: Determine prevalence of osteoporosis screening and prevention and modes of treatment in women older than 65 years at risk of osteoporosis.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of older female patients seeking osteoporosis screening in the community setting.

Results: 399 women at risk of low bone mineral density (BMD) underwent dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning. Among participants younger than 65 years (n=52), low BMD was diagnosed in 44.2%; among participants older than 65 years (n=347), low BMD was diagnosed in 70.0%, a statistically significant difference (P=.001).

Conclusion: From a community-level perspective, the authors have shown that osteoporosis screening at local senior centers, living facilities, and health fairs is an effective tool for identifying low BMD in women at high risk of osteopenia and osteoporosis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Osteopathic Association.
   Recruitment Ad