HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Boulet, J. R. Articles by Finley, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Boulet, J. R. Articles by Finley, M.

From the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners in Chicago, Ill (Boulet, Gimpel); New York College of Osteopathic Medicine of New York Institute of Technology in Old Westbury (Dowling); and Western University of Health Sciences College of Osteopathic Medicine of the Pacific in Pomona, Calif (Finley).

Address correspondence to John R. Boulet, PhD, Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates, 3624 Market St, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2685. E-mail: jboulet{at}ecfmg.org

While osteopathic and allopathic medicine share many commonalities, there are key practice-based differences that uniquely characterize the two professions. For osteopathic medicine, one such defining feature is the use of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT). Unfortunately, while various treatment modalities are taught in osteopathic medical schools, there has been relatively little work done to establish standardized evaluation protocols. The purpose of this investigation was to explore the use of OMT assessment in the context of a multistation standardized patient examination.

Analysis of performance data from 121 fourth-year osteopathic medical students indicated that the ability to do OMT can be reliably and validly assessed using a combination of simulated patient encounters, trained osteopathic physician raters, and an objective rating tool. Additional studies that incorporate a larger sample of students and focus on modifications to the assessment tool and rating protocols are warranted.