JAOA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JAOA • Vol 104 • No 4 • April 2004 • 165-176
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ross, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gardin, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ross, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Gardin, J. M.

CLINICAL PRACTICE

Common Scenarios to Clarify the Interpretation of Cardiac Markers

Gary E. Ross, DO; Frank N. Bever, MD; Zi Uddin, PhD; Lingareddy Devireddy, MD; Julius M. Gardin, MD

From the hospitals of St John Health in Michigan: St John Oakland Hospital (Ross) in Madison Heights; St John Detroit Riverview Hospital (Bever, Uddin); St John Macomb Hospital (Devireddy) in Warren; and St John Hospital and Medical Center (Gardin, Ross) also in Detroit.

Address correspondence to Gary E. Ross, DO, Physician Director Quality Improvement, St John Oakland Hospital, 27351 Dequindre Rd, Madison Heights, MI 48071-3499. E-mail: gary.ross{at}stjohn.org

The authors present a practical approach for physicians in clinical practice to use cardiac troponins in the interpretation of heart disease and myocardial damage. Laboratory results that fall within the intermediate area of facility-specific cutoff reference values for elevated troponin levels confer lower risks to patients than do higher levels of cardiac troponin. Perhaps not surprisingly, the actual anatomy of the vessels at cardiac catheterization does not correlate well with the troponin level.

In the six cases presented here, the patients' low levels of troponin release are discussed using the new term minimal myocardial infarction, which is synonymous with conditions that would previously have been diagnosed as unstable angina. Elevated levels of cardiac troponin provide a very sensitive measure for clinicians diagnosing patients with myocardial necrosis, but such measures are also useful in defining a broad spectrum of disease. Whenever the troponin levels are elevated (barring laboratory error), the patient has a poorer prognosis. The greatest challenge for physicians is in determining which patients with cardiac troponin elevation will best benefit from heart catheterization and percutaneous intervention.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. M. Bunk and M. J. Welch
Characterization of a New Certified Reference Material for Human Cardiac Troponin I
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2006; 52(2): 212 - 219.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Osteopathic Association.