JAOA Advertisement
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


JAOA • Vol 102 • No 9 • September 2002 • 477-480
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Agostini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Parente, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Agostini, D.
Right arrow Articles by Parente, D.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION

Student performance on the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination-USA level 2 following a clinical evaluation, feedback, and intervention program

DE Agostini; AS Stano; DH Parente

The purpose of this study was to examine student performance on the Comprehensive Osteopathic Medical Licensing Examination-USA (COMLEX-USA) level 2 examination following a clinical evaluation, feedback, and intervention program. Students who completed their core clinical training (year 3) at the Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine in Erie, Pennsylvania, returned to the campus for a weeklong series of clinical science testing. Their performance in this program was compared to their performance on COMLEX-USA level 2 administered by the National Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners approximately 3 months later. The authors analyzed other student data (Medical College Admission Test scores, grade point averages, and COMLEX-USA level 1 scores) to identify the relationship between these variables and the students' success (or failure) on COMLEX-USA level 2. Using a correlation approach, the authors found a relationship between COMLEX-USA levels 1 and 2 as well as between the preparation week and COMLEX-USA level 2, and that the significant difference in the results of the "at-risk" students continues in the COMLEX-USA level 2 performance. Further, the intervention used with students performing at less-than-satisfactory levels in the preparation program was successful in improving the performance of this group to a level equal to that of the second decile, thus increasing the likelihood that these students will pass the COMLEX-USA level 2 examination.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAOA: Journal of the American Osteopathic AssociationHome page
D. J. Sefcik
Attention Applicants: Please Submit Emotional Intelligence Scores
J Am Osteopath Assoc, September 1, 2005; 105(9): 401 - 402.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Osteopathic Association.